I agree with Alex, but I have a question: how do you plan to handle interactions, more
specifically node replacement operations?
On 27 May 2011, at 12:22, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
I feel we should opt for 2).
We should export the visualization using Protovis, not recoding Mondrian in Protovis.
Alexandre
On 27 May 2011, at 12:19, Santiago Vidal wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been working in the visualization of the inner nodes. In general I have 2
options to work with protovis:
> • Be independent of the data by means of the use of Protovis Layouts.
> • Copy the same visualization that is used by Mondrian. That is create a Protovis
canvas of the same size that the canvas of Mondrian and place each shape in Protovis in
the same location that in the canvas of Mondrian.
> While the first option is more modifiable than the second, it implies the creation of
new layouts when they are needed.
> The main advantage of the second option is that the generated html file could be
interactive (such as the example that I send before). However, it doesn't improve the
graphics generated by Mondrian.
> What do you think is the best option?
> Cheers
> Santiago
--
Johan Fabry
jfabry(a)dcc.uchile.cl -
http://dcc.uchile.cl/~jfabry
PLEIAD Lab - Computer Science Department (DCC) - University of Chile