28 Jun
2007
28 Jun
'07
2:23 p.m.
Thank you, Martin!
May you also provide the metamodel as .ecore file? Dot-ecore is the
EMF fileformat, as I understand, right?
Also I saw you have association subclasses for class cast and
instance of checks. I like that approach, do you also have done or
thought about extending the model for annotations and generics?
cheers,
AA
On 28 Jun 2007, at 11:52 , Martin Pinzger wrote:
Hi,
Here is our FAMIX core model for representing Java source code.
http://seal.ifi.unizh.ch/wiki/swiki/show/FamixCore
There are some differences in naming that can be easily fixed, such
as we use "parent" instead of "belongsTo". The other main difference
concerns modifiers of entities. We use an integer to represent the
scope, static, abstract, etc. modifier of classes, methods, and
attributes instead of having extra attributes. Furthermore, we added
an abstract "Conext" class to indicate container entities (i.e.,
entities that can contain other famix entities).
Feel free to use and comment.
--Martin.
On Jun 28, 2007, at 12:48 AM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Martin,
At FAMOOSr you mentioned that you performed renamings on FAMIX?
Could you summarize them?
The current names of the elements can be found in the UML diagram:
http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/famixmetamodel/
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba
www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/
"Every thing should have the right to be different."
Dr. Martin Pinzger
University of Zurich, Department of Informatics
http://seal.ifi.uzh.ch/pinzger
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev