Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6621 discussions

can we know how many download the postgres server is doing on moose?
by stephane ducasse 16 Nov '07

16 Nov '07

Hi guys could you ask the syst admin if we can know how the activity of a particular DB entry at the postgres level? Stef

2 1

Moose Suite Loader
by Timo Gienger 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hi Moose-Dev-Team, i´m currently trying to install Moose with the Moose Suite Loader in Visual Works 7.5. When i try to download the suite, the first dialog tells me "currently disconnected, do you want to reconnect?" so sure i want, so clicking yes leads me to the next problem that tells me "A problem was detected. Please try again". The status window in VisualWorks tells me: " visualnc.im created at April 17, 2007 10:52:24 amERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ERROR: current transaction is aborted, commands ignored until end of transaction block ... " I hope you can help me to install the Moose Suite because i want to use it in my diplom-thesis about software-metrics. I wanted to use the MooseSuite in a chapter about visualizing metrics in the software development process. Thanks in advice! Greetings Timo Gienger

2 1

Patterns for Mondrian
by Adrian Kuhn 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

We extended Mondrian with patterns | view | view := Mondrian.ViewRenderer new. view rectangleShape. view shape fillColor: CodeFoo.Color red. view shape patternColor: CodeFoo.Color black. view shape patternName: [ :each ]. view shape width: 120. view shape height: 80. view nodes: #(gray diagonal inverseDiagonal fancy) . view open. cheers, AA & Hani

3 3

Feature request Mondrian: #sendToBack, #bringToFront, etc...
by Adrian Kuhn 15 Nov '07

15 Nov '07

Hey Doru, I did not manage to achieve this, can you take care? We want to have - sendToBack - bringToFront - sendBackword - bringForward in the context menu of Mondrian figure. (as in Excel par example) cheers, AA

2 1

just a meta wish...
by stephane ducasse 14 Nov '07

14 Nov '07

Hi guys we have been discussing with alex here about our visibility since other groups at inria are using Gforge and are counting their donwloads. I think that we cannot do too much because I do not see how it would make sense to use svn for developing Moose. Now I see several paths to help moose while helping us (stef at inria) internally: I think tat this is really important to refer to the moose articles in the paper and PhD thesis. Oscar Nierstrasz, Stéphane Ducasse and Tudor Gîrba, The Story of Moose: an Agile Reengineering Environment, In Proceedings of the European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC/FSE 2005), New York NY, ACM Press, pp. 1-10, 2005, Invited paper, PDF , DOI Stéphane Ducasse, Tudor Gîrba, Michele Lanza and Serge Demeyer, Moose: a Collaborative and Extensible Reengineering Environment, In Tools for Software Maintenance and Reengineering, Milano, Franco Angeli, pp. 55-71, 2005, PDF Stef

2 1

dynamoose tests
by Tudor Girba 07 Nov '07

07 Nov '07

Hi, In the latest version 1.313, DynaMoose seems to have lost its tests. Is this by mistake, or is it intended? Cheers, Doru -- www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "The coherence of a trip is given by the clearness of the goal."

3 3

Can we derive invocation candidates?
by Adrian Kuhn 06 Nov '07

06 Nov '07

There was discussion if it might be possible to omit the list of invocation candidates and just give the "most common candidate" and derive all others. Please find below an example where this does not work for statically types languages. The client class invokes m() on an instance of B. m is implement in A (B's superclass) and C and D (B's subclasses), but also in E (a sibling of B). Lets assume we just store the "most common candidate" A.m and derive candidates looking at subclasses, then we get the false positive E.m! Another case (which applies to dynamic languages too) is when m() is invoked using a super send somewhere in D, and we just store A.m() and we derive it now, again D.m and E.m and C.m are false positive. So at least you need information about receiver type signature (not yet 1st class in FAMIX!) kind of lookup (self, super, whatever...) whereas the "most specific candidate" encodes implementing type and signature as string. So for now, maybe best is to just store all candidates in any case. cheers, Toon and AA

1 1

FAMIX 3.0 draft v0.8
by Toon Verwaest 02 Nov '07

02 Nov '07

Hi, Find in attachment the first open draft version of the FAMIX 3.0 metamodel. Review and comments welcomed! cheers, Toon

8 20

New meta-metamodel for Moose?
by Adrian Kuhn 29 Oct '07

29 Oct '07

Dear Moosers, I was pondering over Famix and found that it only uses 20% of EMOF's features. As it seems, the E in EMOF is not really standing for essential :) What I came up with when porting MSE to Java, is a much simpler mmmodel. I documented it on the wiki http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/mse/msemmmodel/ would be nice to make this the new mmmodel of moose and get rid of all the EMOF bloat. by the way, a Java implementation is in its first draft, if you are interested contact me. cheers, AA

8 17

Proposal, FM3 (Famix meta-metamodel)
by Adrian Kuhn 26 Oct '07

26 Oct '07

http://smallwiki.unibe.ch/moose/mse/fm3meta-metamodel/ What do you think? cheers, AA

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev