Moose-dev

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

6621 discussions

Start a nNew thread

Code of distribution map and package blueprint
by Romain PEIRS 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Hi I'm looking for the code of distribution map and package blueprint. Where could I get these information? Thanks

2 1

Boy Survives Moose Attack Thanks To World Of Warcraft
by Adrian Kuhn 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

http://blog.wired.com/games/2007/12/boy-survives-mo.html

3 2

How to run the Python and C++ importers
by Adrian Kuhn 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

> Importers for Java, C++, Python and Smalltalk. How to run the Python and C++ importer? Which tools are doing this anyway? The only thing I now is that Martin once write some python scripts, but I do not remember where they are and how to run them. Java import refers to iPlasma, currently, I guess. AA

4 13

[moose.unibe.ch] encoded and reusable mail addresses
by Tudor Girba 12 Dec '07

12 Dec '07

Hi, I added two components to moose.unibe.ch for reusing the mail addresses of the mailing lists. So, now you can use the followings: +/reusable/moosecontact+ will produce moose(a)iam.unibe.ch +/reusable/moosedev+ will produce moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch The howto page is here: http://moose.unibe.ch/varia/howtoedit/mails Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com www.tudorgirba.com/blog "Beauty is where we see it."

1 0

Moved all linear algebra classes to Hapax namespace, please update your code [nt]
by Adrian Kuhn 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

1 0

Custom Visualizations in Mondrian
by Usman Bhatti 11 Dec '07

11 Dec '07

I am trying to create custom visulizations with Mondrian using the scripts described in "Mondrian: An Agile Information Visualization Framework", but I am not able to execute this script... *view := ViewRenderer new. view nodes: model classes using: RectangleShape withBorder. view open.* I have tried "model allClasses" as well, but it says there is no model class.

3 2

fm3 opposites
by Toon Verwaest 10 Dec '07

10 Dec '07

Hi, currently opposites are described as opposite and opposite+derived. This can be one->one, one->many, many->one and many->many. We can easily generate code which handles all those different cases. Secondly, when we are writing out instances of fm3-described classes; we know when attributes have an opposite. There the derived is quite unimportant; since it is just a hint to the writer "which" of the 2 opposites it should write and which it should derive. However, since you can generate code which takes all different cases into account, writing it out (and reading it in) either way is possible. The opposite can be filled in from either of the available relationships. So which opposite you file out could be chosen randomly. Coming to my point: do attributes which have an opposite need a derived statement? Isn't it more logical that only real algorithmic "attributes" are derived? When choosing automatically you will only have to take care that if an opposite is its own opposite (the opposite of the attribute "opposite" in fm3.Property is like this; that's probably the only case :)), that it always gets written. #((( #This fact would again strengthen my case that the opposite of an opposite should not necessarily be #declared as an opposite in the MSE file. Nor should the type be in either of them. If we find (prop (id: 2) #(opposite (idref: 1))), then we should automatically do (objectAtId: 1).setOpposite(objectAtId: 2), #which sets the owner of (objectAtId: 2) as it's type, sets the type of the (objectAtId: 2) as the owner of #(objectAtId: 1); and then sets (objectAtId: 2) as the opposite of (objectAtId: 1) # #---->> if you use an opposite-declaration for an attribute; you have 1 statement instead of 5 for which 4 are #redundant ----> less redundancy => better performance #))) any ideas / comments? Does this seem right / clean? cheers, Toon

2 6

Where is FAMIXInterface ?
by Alexandre Bergel 09 Dec '07

09 Dec '07

Dear list, Is there no way to describes an interface in FAMIX? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

2 1

About using Mondrian
by Alexandre Bergel 08 Dec '07

08 Dec '07

Dear list, I wanted to graphically render a model using Mondrian. However It seems that Meye06a is a bit out of sync with the current implementation (feel free to say that I am wrong :-). When I open the easel, in the pane where I am supposed to script the variable 'model' does not seems to be known. I tried to cut and paste the following script (extracted from the paper) but it is not accepted by the easel: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= view := ViewRenderer new. view nodes: model classes using: (Rectangle withBorder height: #NOM; width: #NOA). view edges: model inheritances using: (Line from: #superclass to: #subclass). view layout: TreeLayout new. view open. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= How can I draw the UML diagram for a given model? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

3 2

about KDM
by stephane ducasse 08 Dec '07

08 Dec '07

Hi someone pointed to the KDM metamodel. Could be relevant for us :) Software Modernisation Metamodel http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-03-15.pdf stef

3 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev