Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 951 by v.blonde...(a)gmail.com: Export then Import a MSE Model
throws FMSyntaxError
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=951
Hi,
I wanted to export and import a MSE file of a Moose Model.
The export works perfectly but the import which throws an FMSyntaxError.
You can reproduce from the Moose Panel by creating a Model from Smalltalk,
export it (Import/export / Export to MSE), and import it.
The pragma in FAMIXMethod>>clientClasses :
<MSEProperty: 'Client classes' type: #FAMIXType> <multivalued>
seems to be the problem. Indeed 'Client Classes' contains a space character
which is
not recognize by the MSE parser.
I resolved by deleting the space.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-GlamorousToolkit
New issue 955 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: GTInspector should install methods
in the selected class
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=955
Right now, the inspector installs methods in the class of the current
object.
Instead, it should install the methods in the selected class (from the drop
down).
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Thanks igor.
On Jul 11, 2013, at 4:07 PM, Igor Stasenko <siguctua(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> So, after spending unproportionally huge time (2days) dealing with
> jenkins config idiosyncrasies,
> it finally managed to build it.
>
> http://files.pharo.org/vm/pharo/win/latest.zip
>
> This VM should react properly on
> AddressSpaceLimit=<number of MBytes>
> setting in .ini file.
> The ini file is located in same directory as VM executable.
> If it doesn't exists, you can run VM once and it will create it automatically.
>
> Thanks for patience.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
Sounds like a good idea, if you have the time.
How do you build the AST incrementally and iteratively,
so you can show (end-user) results every day?
Stephan
Hi!
Some of you may have heard about Hierarchical Bundle Edges. If no, then use google to find their cool papers.
We will soon have a working implementation :-)
Cheers,
Hernan & Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
So, it looks like everyone that wanted to speak up has spoken up. From a
strictly numeric standpoint it looks like the consensus is tied - 3 for
strict grammar adherence, and 3 for allowing it to be looser (maybe
significantly). But, popular vote isn't really the best way to solve
technical problems.
After reviewing the arguments again, the case for following the published
grammar does make a lot of sense, especially since there is one. For my
purposes, I'll either subclass that grammar or figure out how to use it
directly (probably by extended it in my image as necessary). I still like
a more focused AST, but given that I am not a Java expert, I definitely
shouldn't be the one creating it - at least not the general one.
So, how/when should I/we go about converting the current AST over? I will
be interested in converting at least the parts that I want - which is more
than there is now, but not the entire grammar. Note that this will change
any Visitors using the AST, meaning that the Fast build will probably
continue to fail as work is progressing.
Might I suggest that a symbolic version be made against PetitJava that the
Fast job uses - that uses a static version of PetitJava. This would stop
the job from failing; the static version can be updated when you are ready
to incorporate the changes in.
Thanks,
Chris
Hi Vincent,
FMMSEParser basicRun shoudl do the trick
What's your end goal for this? Because most of what you can do with moose
is going to perform pretty bad over high latency slow bandwidth connections.
http://sealedabstract.com/rants/why-mobile-web-apps-are-slow/
Stephan
Hi,
In developing moose on web, I wanted to use the MSE parsing to import by
the web an moose model.
Guillaume and I discover that the parsing trigs a job showing a progress
bar. This UI stuff is directly implemented in the parser
(FMMSEParser>>run) what is not really the way to do it according
Guillaume.... and I can't disable it easily for running the parsing on a
server...
What do you think ?
Cheers,
Vincent
Hi,
Moose on Web is on the Web !
The purpose of this project is to access the moose image across the web
through a Rest Api
I let you discover ...
You can try it at:
http://37.139.2.203
And access directly to the API at:
http://37.139.2.203/API
Cheers,
Vincent