Hi Nicolas,
> On 15 Feb 2017, at 12:00, moose-dev-request(a)list.inf.unibe.ch wrote:
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 12:10:54 +0100
> From: Nicolas Anquetil <nicolas.anquetil(a)inria.fr <mailto:nicolas.anquetil@inria.fr>>
> To: Moose-related development <moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch <mailto:moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch>>
> Subject: [Moose-dev] Re: software reingineering guidelines
> Message-ID: <f856fa35-917e-0a5a-a84c-41d89ebe83ac(a)inria.fr <mailto:f856fa35-917e-0a5a-a84c-41d89ebe83ac@inria.fr>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
> Hi Abdou,
>
> not that I know of.
> Moose provides the tools, the engineers must provide the "intelligence",
> the processus to extract needed informatino.
>
> We currently have a project with Master students along these lines, but
> they did not deliver it yet, so no experience result yet neither.
I was thinking that people from Synectic (for instance) could have some valuable experience in this field (where to start from, a list of what to look for, how to look for it, the different reports, …)
>
> We recommended using Roassal (and explained how to use it) to try to get
> an understanding of the “architecture”
Yes, and use the queries to gets different metrics about the projects. maybe detect some (anti) patterns...
>
> Actually, asking them to explain HOW they got their results (As well as
> WHAT results they got) could be interesting
Definitely, this is part of the objectives too :)
Maybe we could produce a sorte of practical guide to code analysis with Moose.
>
> nicolas