Hello,
Is there a way to set a default selection to a list presentation? so that
when I open the browser, the morphic list has already a value selected.
I tried that:
|tmpBrowser|
tmpBrowser := GLMTabulator new.
tmpBrowser row: #list.
tmpBrowser transmit to: #list; andShow: [:a |
a list
display: [:input | input];
selection: #a;
yourself
].
tmpBrowser openOn: #( b c d v a d f r).
but the list still open with nothing selected
Hi,
Alex Syrel, Andrei Chis and I are happy to announce a new addition to the
Glamorous Toolkit:
GTSpotter, a novel interface for spotting objects.
GTSpotter has two goals:
- Provide a uniform yet moldable interface that can work on any object, and
- Handle searching through arbitrary levels of object nesting.
We think this will have a significant impact on the development workflow in
Pharo.
Here is a couple of screenshots:
[image: Inline image 2] [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 3]
A trailer is available here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhSmjR3NOlU
A detailed description is available here:
http://www.humane-assessment.com/blog/introducing-gtspotter
It works already in Pharo 3.0 and can be played with by following the
instructions from:
http://gt.moosetechnology.org
Please let us know what you think.
Enjoy,
The Glamorous Team
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1103 by v.blonde...(a)gmail.com: The list resulting of the
Inspection of a MooseGroup should be in alphanumerical order
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1103
Describe the problem: what do you get? what do you expect?
When you inspect with the moose panel (or an inspector) a model, the list
of the group items are randomly sorted.
I expect to have a alphanumerical sort on this list to quickly get an
element of the list.
How to reproduce the problem: step by step if necessary
Do: LANPackageTestResource current model allClasses inspect.
And go to the third tab (containing the list)
Additional information: platform, context which may impact the problem
Moose 5.0
Please fill in the labels with the following information:
* Type-Enhancement
* Component-GT
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1105 by v.blonde...(a)gmail.com: Moose Importing Abstract Classes -
Packages Reorganisation
https://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1105
The organisation of the Moose importers is a bit messy.
The classe MooseAbstractImporter should be used by MooseImportingTask and
be a subclass of MooseTask.
MooseImportingTask is only used for smalltalk so it should be in
Moose-SmalltalkImporter.
And MooseOperator is not only for Smalltalk so it should be in the
Moose-Core package.
This following my mail from last year:
http://www.iam.unibe.ch/pipermail/moose-dev/2014-April/019420.html
and the discussion from 2011 from Usman and Stef:
http://forum.world.st/Proposal-to-enhance-the-MooseTask-inheritance-and-Moo…
Please fill in the labels with the following information:
* Type-Engineering
* Component-Moose
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Roassal
New issue 896 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Roassal should offer a proper
scrolling mechanism
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=896
For any visualisation that is larger than the screen, you immediately get
lost in Roassal. Furthermore, the current dragging style does not scale for
visualizations that are much larger on one dimension than the screen.
We need a mechanism that helps us:
- get an idea of where we are (and how much is left outside the current
view)
- have an easy way to actually scroll through a larger space
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Roassal
New issue 956 by usman.bh...(a)gmail.com: Problem of focus with GLM-Roassal
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=956
The focus is not correct in visualizations created with GLM-Roassal: The
focus is centered on the lower right part of the diagram. So zooming-in
hides the upper-left part of the diagram.
To reproduce:
Moose Finder -> a-Moose-Model -> all packages -> visualize -> Dependencies
(cycles) -> zoom-in.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Status: New
Owner: ----
CC: alexandr...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Roassal Milestone-5.0
New issue 1004 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Roassal should offer circular
treemaps
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=1004
Rectangle treemaps are nice, but the still make it difficult to understand
deep nesting. Circular treemaps do a better job there.
It should not be hard to extend the TreeMapBuilder to support this.
See here:
http://lip.sourceforge.net/ctreemap.html
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 915 by cunningh...(a)gmail.com: Roassal Mondrian - Circle with Text
obscures text
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=915
I want to draw a node in the diagram with a circle (actually, an ellipse)
around it, which works. However, the circle obscures part of the text. If
the text is multi-line, it obscures quite a bit, in fact.
File in the attached extension to ROMondrianExmaple, then run:
ROMondrianExample new labeledCircle
You should see the issue.
Latest Moose Suite 4.7, windows platform.
Labels: Type-Enhancement
Labels: Component-Roassal
Attachments:
LabeledCircle.1.cs 582 bytes
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
Hi,
Since the work on the integration of PPContext in PetitParser, there is
significant performance degradation. I have already mentioned that on
simple grammar the factor is about 2. But on complex grammar (for example,
our proprietary parser for 4D language ), we have seen that degradation is
goes well beyond this factor. So, for example, for 800K lines that we parse
in under 10 minutes without PPContext work, with the latest version it goes
beyond 2h.
I have not been able to reproduce my case on simple grammars. May be we can
have some benchmarks using open source parsers and large code bases (e.g.
PP Java Parser on JHotDraw or ArgoUML).
Currently, I circumvent this issue by using PP v1.51 but I can provide
relevant feedback and run benches on any improvements.
regards.
Usman
Hello
We use Roassal 2 for visual side of a project we are working on - a
diagram modelling tool (like enterprise architect) and we came to a
specific need. There are notations like UML which need heads/arrows on
both ends of a single line.
As far as I understand the roassal code, line decorations are encoded to
be at the "to" end and can't be on the other one.
We would use help with this problem.
Thanks
Jan Blizničenko