Hi all!
I am Juraj Kubelka and I am obtained sponsorship from Object Profile company for 4 months. Right now I live in Santiago de Chile and in August 2013 I am going to start PhD program here.
The goal of my 4 months work is to "get rid of Mondrian" from the all Moose tools and replace it with Roassal. Alexandre Bergel posted more specific details about it.
Well, the first I want to ask: Can I obtain access into related Moose repositories on http://smalltalkhub.com? My account is JurajKubelka.
Today I did the first pair-programming with Alexandre Bergel. We added some tests in order to do changes and committed into Moose repositories.
Cheers,
Jura
Hello,
I am trying to arrange two sets of nodes in verticalLineLayout with
Roassal, and within a set, the nodes are arranged in a gridLayout. The
script below allows works fine except that the execution time is too long
when the number of nodes is large and hence I am unable to achieve
multi-layout visualization for large number of nodes.
view := ROMondrianViewBuilder new.
view shape rectangle withoutBorder.
view node:#aaa forIt:[
view shape rectangle.
view nodes: (1 to: 10000).
view gridLayout.
].
view shape rectangle withoutBorder.
view node:#bbb forIt:[
view shape rectangle.
view nodes: (1 to: 1000).
view gridLayout.
].
view verticalLineLayout.
view open
Can you please have a look or could you suggest an alternate solution? I
have created my own custom layout but that is tied to the structure of my
nodes and hence not generic.
tx.
usman
Hi Alex,
Right now, Versionner makes the #development version point to an actual
version, and this breaks the flow in Moose, especially when we commit
something to Roassal. Could you change the behavior such that #development
point to the baseline associated with the current version?
Cheers,
Doru
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Alexandre Bergel
<alexandre.bergel(a)me.com>wrote:
> Yep, it is part of 1.287.
>
> Thanks Doru!
>
> Alexandre
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 5:13 AM, Dennis Schenk <d.schenk(a)students.unibe.ch>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > Just saw that Tudor already did what I suggested. Nevermind then :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dennis
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Dennis Schenk <
> d.schenk(a)students.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > Hi Alexandre,
> >
> > I think we should remove the test
> testEdgeDrivenLayoutingOfCollectionClass from ROTreeMapLayoutTest, since,
> as you pointed out correctly, it is based on something that can change.
> Meaning if something changes within the Collection class hierarchy, we
> would have to adapt the test, which is not desirable.
> >
> > I would suggest to remove the test. I will think about creating another
> one which tests the special case we had with the collection subclass
> treemap.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dennis
> >
>
> --
> _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
> Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
> ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
>
>
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"
Hi,
I'm was exploring some methods to build method wrappers and I discovered Spy.
Unfortunately the sample code provided on http://www.moosetechnology.org/tools/Spy does not run.
When you reach this point
> You can simply invoke it with:
>
> | packageSpy |
> packageSpy := DemoTestCoveragePackageSpy runTestAndGatherForPackageNamed: 'Mondrian'.
There is no "DemoTestCoveragePackageSpy" yet.
Afterward this class is defined but still there is no message "runTestAndGatherForPackageNamed".
Any hep would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Roberto
Just wondering.... any thoughts about porting Roassal to Amber?
Or are there other ways of getting the same sort of layout and
interactivity in a web browser from Pharo as a server ?
cheers -ben
Hi,
is there ready class visualisation in Mondrian which displays also instance
variables and methods?
If I do in Mondrian Easel this:
----
view shape umlClass.
view node: Color
----
I receive a UML class with name. It does not contain instance variables and
methods.
I am curious how to build it with complex shapes framework.
Thank you.
Jura
Status: New
Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-4.8 Component-Finder
New issue 925 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: Parse with VerveineJ menu entry
should work properly
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=925
Right now, it raises an exception due to FileDirectory
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
I would also want to thank the participants! The atmosphere was nice and
the presentation was interesting.
I for one learnt quite a bit.
The sessions were recorded, and once Stephan Eggermont will convert them,
they will be posted.
Doru
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr
> wrote:
> Thanks again to Doru and SCG
> because the pharo conf was really nice and the moose day too.
>
> Stef
>
>
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"