Moose-dev February 2013

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

21 participants
145 discussions

PPTextHighlighter removed/moved
by Andrei Vasile Chis 05 Feb '13

05 Feb '13

Hi, In the latest version from jenkins the MoosePanel in not very usable because PPTextHighlighter is missing from the image, and it's still used in FAMIXJavaSourceLanguage and MooseMSEFilesExplorer. I saw it was removes in the latest version of PetitGui. Cheers, Andrei

2 1

The idea behind "derived" pragma
by Yuriy Tymchuk 04 Feb '13

04 Feb '13

Hi everyone! I have a question about a <derived> pragma. As stated on http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/wiki/FameMetaDescriptions : <derived> the property value can be derived from other properties (no need for persistence). So I have a question: why are for example localVariables and parameters of a FAMIXBehaviouralEntity derived when they are stored in the instance variable? Regards Yuriy -- View this message in context: http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/The-idea-behind-derived-pragma-tp40260… Sent from the moose-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

2 2

Issue 880 in moose-technology: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Feb '13

03 Feb '13

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.7 New issue 880 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=880 When creating models without classpath, invocations/methods (where the biding are not found) are created in the format: anInvocation(???) This is the case even if the real invocation in source code contains parameters such as: anInvocation(a, b) It would be good maintain the information with respect to the number of parameters in such invocation/method, and then export the #signature with something like: anInvocation(?, ?) Like that we can at least count the number of parameters.

1 14

Issue 909 in moose-technology: FAMIXNamedEntity>>receivingInvocations ?!?
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 03 Feb '13

03 Feb '13

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 909 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXNamedEntity>>receivingInvocations ?!? http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=909 Why is there a receivingInvocations attribute in FAMIXNamedEntity ? Is that a remnant of MooseCook ?

1 2

Issue 838 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export non-javadoc comments
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 01 Feb '13

01 Feb '13

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 838 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export non-javadoc comments http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=838 VerveineJ exports javadoc comments for both types and methods. However, it does not export line comments like: //This is also a relevant comment

1 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev February 2013