Moose-dev February 2013

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

21 participants
145 discussions

by Andrei Vasile Chis

Hi, In the latest version from jenkins the MoosePanel in not very usable because PPTextHighlighter is missing from the image, and it's still used in FAMIXJavaSourceLanguage and MooseMSEFilesExplorer. I saw it was removes in the latest version of PetitGui. Cheers, Andrei

11 years, 2 months

The idea behind "derived" pragma

by Yuriy Tymchuk

Hi everyone! I have a question about a <derived> pragma. As stated on http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/wiki/FameMetaDescriptions : <derived> the property value can be derived from other properties (no need for persistence). So I have a question: why are for example localVariables and parameters of a FAMIXBehaviouralEntity derived when they are stored in the instance variable? Regards Yuriy -- View this message in context: http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/The-idea-behind-derived-pragma-tp40260… Sent from the moose-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

11 years, 2 months

Issue 880 in moose-technology: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.7 New issue 880 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Improving VerveineJ stub invocations/methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=880 When creating models without classpath, invocations/methods (where the biding are not found) are created in the format: anInvocation(???) This is the case even if the real invocation in source code contains parameters such as: anInvocation(a, b) It would be good maintain the information with respect to the number of parameters in such invocation/method, and then export the #signature with something like: anInvocation(?, ?) Like that we can at least count the number of parameters.

11 years, 2 months

Issue 909 in moose-technology: FAMIXNamedEntity>>receivingInvocations ?!?

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Famix New issue 909 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: FAMIXNamedEntity>>receivingInvocations ?!? http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=909 Why is there a receivingInvocations attribute in FAMIXNamedEntity ? Is that a remnant of MooseCook ?

11 years, 2 months

Issue 838 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export non-javadoc comments

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 838 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ does not export non-javadoc comments http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=838 VerveineJ exports javadoc comments for both types and methods. However, it does not export line comments like: //This is also a relevant comment

11 years, 2 months

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev February 2013