Moose-dev May 2012

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

21 participants
109 discussions

Issue 720 in moose-technology: Classic Coder should highlight the extension categories

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-GlamorousToolkit New issue 720 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Classic Coder should highlight the extension categories http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=720 Currently, only classes and methods are shown as extensions using gray. Categories should be grayed out as well.

11 years, 9 months

Issue 640 in moose-technology: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: andreho...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-EyeSee New issue 640 by andreho...(a)gmail.com: Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=640 Get the axis labels in a lineDiagram in not working. See example below: | diag factory | factory := ESDummyFactory new. factory yValues: #(22 25 13 16 24 28 35 24 32 24 46 12). factory identifiers: #('January' 'February' 'March' 'April' 'Mai' 'June' 'July' 'August' 'September' 'October' 'November' 'December'). diag := ESDiagramRenderer new. (diag lineDiagram) y: #yValue; width: 500; height: 400; lineWidth: 5; defaultFontSize: 12; identifier: #identifier; labels: [:each | each]; defaultColor: Color blue; yAxisLabel: 'Clients'; regularAxis; deviationValue: 22; deviationDescription: 'avg 2006'; models: factory buildDummies. "startLineAtZero;" ^ diag open

11 years, 9 months

Issue 637 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 637 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should show an invocation to the default constructor http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=637 A call to the default constructor should be modeled like: - create a stub constructor in the target class - create an invocation to the constructor See the attached class for a sample. Attachments: DefaultConstructor.java 184 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 636 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 636 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should set hasClassScope http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=636 Static fields or methods should be marked with hasClassScope=true: public static int attributeWithClassScope; public static void methodWithClassScope() {} See the attached sample class. Attachments: ClassScope.java 179 bytes

11 years, 9 months

Issue 781 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should mark getters setters and constants

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 781 by santiago...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ should mark getters setters and constants http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=781 The property "kind" of the MSE models should be used to mark if a method is a getter, a setters or constant. Currently is only used to mark if a method is constructor

12 years

Issue 734 in moose-technology: VerveineJ does not export parameters for stub methods

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 734 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ does not export parameters for stub methods http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=734 If we analyze this code, the print method will appear without parameters. public class NoParametersInStubMethods { public void invoking() { System.out.print("aString"); } }

12 years

Issue 761 in moose-technology: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: Accepted Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ New issue 761 by anquetil...(a)gmail.com: Missing method invocation with VerveineJ http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=761 see discussion on mailing list: "invokingMethods broken in moose or inFamix" source code: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/stanbol/trunk/enhancer/engines/ke… The method getLinkedEntityTypes in org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.keywordextraction.linking.EntityLinker has an empty collection of invokingMethods even though the method is invoked for example by "process()".

12 years

Issue 762 in moose-technology: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 762 by usman.bh...(a)gmail.com: VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from the Moose interface http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=762 First, I invoke VerveineJ from Moose menu to analyse a program A. It analyses the program and imports its entities in a moose model. I invoke VJ once more from moose menu to analyse another program B. When VJ is executed and the entities of program B are imported, I also find in the same model the entities related to the program A. So, VerveineJ keeps the history of old entities, when invoked from Moose interface. I think the problem can be resolved by deleting output.mse once VJ has finished its analysis and the entities are imported in a moose model.

12 years

Issue 746 in moose-technology: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: anquetil...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-VerveineJ Milestone-4.6 New issue 746 by tu...(a)tudorgirba.com: VerveineJ should create parameters for methods with different signatures http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=746 In some cases, calls to external libraries get reified as methods with proper signatures, but without parameters. I am trying to reproduce this using the following example (in ad_hoc/MultipleSignatures.java): package ad_hoc; import java.io.PrintWriter; import java.io.StringWriter; public class MultipleSignatures { public void callToRegularPrintStackTrace(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace() } public void callToPrintStackTraceWithParam(Throwable t) { t.printStackTrace(new PrintWriter(new StringWriter())) } } I encountered a similar code in a case study. However, in this case, I cannot even get the parser to recognize both printStackTrace calls.

12 years

Issue 769 in moose-technology: Glamour should support drag and drop

by moose-technology＠googlecode.com

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Milestone-4.6 Component-Glamour New issue 769 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Glamour should support drag and drop http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=769 Something like this: a list allowItemDrag: [:item :list | ... ]; itemDrag: [:item :list | ... ] a list allowDropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ]; dropOnItem: [:draggedObject :targetItem :list | ... ]

12 years

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
11
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev May 2012