Moose-dev September 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

30 participants
165 discussions

type aliases
by Tudor Girba 10 Sep '11

10 Sep '11

Hi, In C/C++ you can define something like this: typedef Type TypeAlias; To be able to model this in FAMIX, I introduced FAMIXTypeAlias in Famix-C. However, now I think we have to move it to the Core because of the following reason. Suppose we have something like this: typedef Type TypeAlias; SubType: TypeAlias When enumerating the subclasses of Type, I need to get: - TypeAlias - SubType To do this, when traversing with subclassesDo: I need to take into account the typeAliases associated with each type. This means that the notion of TypeAliases must be in the Core. I hope I explained the matter. Please let me know if you see other alternatives. Cheers, Doru -- www.tudorgirba.com "To lead is not to demand things, it is to make them happen."

3 2

Icon of the one-click image?
by Alexandre Bergel 09 Sep '11

09 Sep '11

Hi! Apparently, the icon of the one-click image is the Squeak one. http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=704 Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

1 0

Issue 702 in moose-technology: inFusion should include C++ typedefs in inheritance definitions
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 09 Sep '11

09 Sep '11

Status: New Owner: georgega...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-ExternalTools New issue 702 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: inFusion should include C++ typedefs in inheritance definitions http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=702 TypeAliases can be inherited from. For example: typedef AClass<AConcreteType> ATypeDefinition; class ASubclass : public ATypeDefinition { }

1 1

Issue 681 in moose-technology: SubclassResponsibility: a JPEGReadWriter had the subclass responsibility to implement #nextPutImage:
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 08 Sep '11

08 Sep '11

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 681 by vonbecm...(a)gmail.com: SubclassResponsibility: a JPEGReadWriter had the subclass responsibility to implement #nextPutImage: http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=681 SubclassResponsibility: a JPEGReadWriter had the subclass responsibility to implement #nextPutImage: Pharo image: Pharo1.3a#13258 Virtual machine used: Croquet Closure Cog VM [CoInterpreter VMMaker-oscog.51] Platform Name: unix Class browser used (if applicable): OBSystemBrowserAdaptor Steps to reproduce: #. select a model. #. select all model namespaces #. press left button, select visualize>>dependencies(cycles) you will see the mondrian renderer #. export to jpeg #. enter a filename #. press Ok Actual Result: SubclassResponsibility: a JPEGReadWriter had the subclass responsibility to implement #nextPutImage: Expected Result: a filename.jpeg with the graph * Type-Defect * Component-Mondrian Renderer Attachments: PharoDebug.log 28.6 KB PharoScreenshot.1.png 69.6 KB

1 3

MOEasel in a navigator?
by Simon Denier 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

I am not sure I followed all what happened with Mondrian in the past months. But given that Mondrian has now support for svg/html export, is there some plan to plug the easel into Glamour/Seaside and have it on the web? -- Simon Denier

3 2

Actions in Glamour
by Alexandre Bergel 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi! I am experiencing a situation which is either unintuitive or reflects a bug. Consider the following script -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= | browser | browser := GLMFinder new. browser text act: [:prez :v | v inspect ] on: $i entitled: 'Inspect'. browser openOn: 'hello world' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= If start to type in it, and trigger the action, an inspector on the string 'hello world' is open, no matter what I typed. Is there anything obvious that I do not see? Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

2 5

Issue 700 in moose-technology: Hover in Glamour
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Status: New Owner: ---- CC: tu...(a)tudorgirba.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Glamour New issue 700 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Hover in Glamour http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=700 #hover is not yet supported by the rendering. Please open a ticket, because this is an old to do that should not be difficult to do. Cheers, Doru On 5 Sep 2011, at 21:56, Alexandre Bergel wrote: Hi! Just wondering whether #hover is supported in Glamour. Apparently not, but I just want to be sure. Cheers, Alexandre

1 0

Hover in Glamour
by Alexandre Bergel 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Hi! Just wondering whether #hover is supported in Glamour. Apparently not, but I just want to be sure. Cheers, Alexandre -- _,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;: Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu ^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.

2 2

Re: [Pharo-project] data set
by Tudor Girba 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Thanks everyone for the suggestions. I will try to look into them. Cheers, Doru On 5 Sep 2011, at 07:04, Lukas Renggli wrote: > Stanford has many large graph-like datasets to download: social > networks, web graphs, peer-to-peer networks, shopping networks, road > networks, wikipedia networks, etc. > > http://snap.stanford.edu/data/ > > Lukas > > On 5 September 2011 06:24, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I've used as an example of datamining a dataset about car accidents we got >> from here http://www.nhtsa.gov/NASS . >> >> Hope it helps :) >> Guille >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Hernán Morales Durand >> <hernan.morales(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> 2011/9/4 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Thanks, but I am looking for data sets that contained graphs of entities >>>> with properties, rather then numbers. >>>> >>> >>> Oh, that was just the top of the iceberg, look at cellular interaction >>> networks like protein-protein interactions, relations between genes >>> and QTLs, phylogenetic trees, gene ontology classifications, etc. >>> probably they have more "properties" and relationships than you ever >>> imagined. Check for example >>> http://www.nature.com/msb/journal/v3/n1/fig_tab/msb4100166_F2.html or >>> the one from the Human Interactome here >>> http://www.blog.republicofmath.com/archives/2005, or >>> http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1471-2164-9-96-s6.jpeg >>> for Gene Ontology "objects". Also PubMed have thousands of related >>> papers about real case studies. >>> >>>> To give an idea, an example would be a set of persons that have multiple >>>> properties, such as age or function, and have various kinds of relationships >>>> with other persons. Ideally, it should be something containing some more >>>> than 5-10 types of entities. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Doru >>>> >>>> >>>> On 5 Sep 2011, at 02:51, Hernán Morales Durand wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Tudor, >>>>> >>>>> I don't know if you want few data sets or many ones, but for each case >>>>> I found "Selecting genes with dissimilar discrimination strength for >>>>> sample class prediction", report case studies in two real cancer >>>>> microarray datasets (CAR and LUNG) for gene expression profiling. The >>>>> Lymphoma case study in humans contains 30 case study genes, you may >>>>> read about it in "Examples and Applications of Fuzzy Measure >>>>> Similarity Using GO Terms". In general you can find many case studies >>>>> from SNP data experiments doing all kind of predictions, for example >>>>> from protein structure prediction studies that use LiveBench data sets >>>>> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiveBench), search for "Consensus fold >>>>> recognition by predicting model quality". >>>>> If you need more or something more specific just ask :) >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Hernán >>>>> >>>>> 2011/9/4 Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com>: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> To show how Moose can support the analysis of various data sets, I am >>>>>> looking for a case study containing a complex data structure that does not >>>>>> represent a software system, and a set of questions associated with it. >>>>>> Ideally, the data should be freely available and it should contain a set of >>>>>> entities with various properties and various relationships with other >>>>>> entities. >>>>>> >>>>>> Anyone has any idea regarding such a case study? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Doru >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>>>> >>>>>> "There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them." >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> www.tudorgirba.com >>>> >>>> "Every successful trip needs a suitable vehicle." >>>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Lukas Renggli > www.lukas-renggli.ch > -- www.tudorgirba.com "Reasonable is what we are accustomed with."

1 0

Issue 699 in moose-technology: Glamour presentations should be easily extensible
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

Status: New Owner: tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Glamour Milestone-4.6 New issue 699 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Glamour presentations should be easily extensible http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=699 Currently, scripting Glamour presentations relies solely on direct setters to the presentations. This makes it hard to create presentations that rely on composite structures. A simple way to provide an extension mechanism would be to implement a with: method: GLMPresentation>>with: aBlock ^ aBlock value: self We could use it like this: composite text with: [:textPresentation | textPresentation ... ]

1 1

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev September 2011