Moose-dev September 2011

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

30 participants
165 discussions

Are Fame Packages defined?
by Stéphane Ducasse 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

Hi I was looking for the package (FM3 one) for FAMIX or Core and Java and I could not find them. Do you know if they got created? I have the impression that this is another sign that pharo need manifestoClass per packages so that we can annotate them and Moose would use them to declare them. Now imagine that we get that (we can just start adding a FAMIXJavaManifest class in the package FAMIX-Java) how do we annotate that this is a FM3Package because <package: > is used to annotate properties And I have the impression that having the distinction between definition and specialisation of annotation is better. We have FMPackage: FMClass: superclass: but we could have FMClassDefinition: superclass FMPackageDefinition: FMPackaged: Stef

2 4

Re: Sytax or what?
by Júlio Martins 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Em 27 de setembro de 2011 13:42, Jùlio <jleandro.martins(a)gmail.com>escreveu: > Ah! I understood what was happening. I really needed select all code to > execute, but I didn't know is needed to open the Trascript browser to > exhibit the result. Other thing was I had not selected completely code. > Sometimes some part of the code don't was selected properly. > > :-) > > Em 26 de setembro de 2011 16:30, Alexandre Bergel-7 [via Smalltalk] < > ml-node+s1294792n3845025h64(a)n4.nabble.com> escreveu: > > Of course, you should have the transcript open (cmd-t) >> >> Alexandre >> >> >> On 26 Sep 2011, at 15:34, Stéphane Ducasse wrote: >> >> > just copy and paste it in workspace >> > select everything and do it. >> > And it should work >> > Moose has nothing special to do with a possible bug. >> > >> > It works also when putting spaces >> > >> > |i| >> > i := 5. >> > [ i >0 ] whileTrue:[ >> > Transcript show: ((i*2) asString) ; cr. >> > i := i - 1. >> > ]. >> > > -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Sytax-or-what-tp3848136p3848136.html Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

1 0

Re: Sytax or what?
by Júlio Martins 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Well, so I will go change the form of my code |i| i:=5. [i >0] whileTrue:[ Transcript show: ((i*2) asString) ; cr. i:=i-1. ]. Why this doesn't work too? I only receive a "Nothing more expected" when I try to execute it. Em 24 de setembro de 2011 02:58, Stéphane Ducasse [via Smalltalk] < ml-node+s1294792n3838776h45(a)n4.nabble.com> escreveu: > There is a bug in Beeper and the default sound primitive > > stef > > On Sep 24, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Júlio Martins wrote: > > > I don't know why this simple code don't work in Moose/Smaltalk version > 4.5 > > > > | counter | > > counter := 0. > > [ counter < 100 ] whileTrue: > > [ counter := counter + 1. > > Beeper beep ] > > > > I believe the sytax is correct, but when I try to excute this an error > message is sent. > > Doesn't exist while loop? > > > > I don't undesrtand what's happening. > > > > View this message in context: Sytax or what? > > Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > > Moose-dev mailing list > > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3838776&i=0> > > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Moose-dev mailing list > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3838776&i=1> > https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev > > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > http://forum.world.st/Sytax-or-what-tp3838424p3838776.html > To start a new topic under Moose, email > ml-node+s1294792n1310756h25(a)n4.nabble.com > To unsubscribe from Moose, click here<http://forum.world.st/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&no…>. > > -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Re-Sytax-or-what-tp3843592p3843592.html Sent from the Moose mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

5 6

[Better Comment Initiative]: CustomSourceLanguage
by Stéphane Ducasse 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

We have ------- FAMIXCustomSourceLanguage has not been documented yet. The class comment should describe the purpose of the class, its collaborations and its variables. Instance Variables: name <ProtoObject | PseudoContext> We can get --------- @@I represent specific source language that is not a language supported by default by moose?@@ Then the comment of name is unclear to me? what is a language that is not explicitly modeled? name <MSEProperty: #name type: #String> <MSEComment: 'The name of a custom language that is not modeled explicitly.'>

2 2

[Better Comment Initiative]: FAMIXNamedEntity
by Stéphane Ducasse 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

We have ------- I'm an abstract class, root of the hierarchy modeling source code entities. Any of my subclasses must define the meaning of the belongsTo, an abstract property that provides polymorphic traversal. For example, FAMIXClass defines belongsTo as being the container, while the FAMIXMethod defines belongsTo to point to the parentType. I propose -------- I'm an abstract class, root of the hierarchy modeling source code entities. Any of my subclasses must define the meaning of the belongsTo property, an abstract property that provides polymorphic traversal. For example, FAMIXClass defines belongsTo as being the container, while the FAMIXMethod defines belongsTo to point to the parentType. I support the tagging of entity as stub. Marking an entity as a stub means that the Stubs should only be marked by importers and extractors. Stubbed entities represent the border of the modeled world as extracted. Stub tagging should not be recursive. Use other tags for such a purpose: a class may have an instance variable tagged as a stub because an importer got a memory leak or a bug. Still the class is not a stub, but extra analysis can mark it as incomplete. When applicable, I also point to my containing package accessible via parentPackage and modifiers. I also can return the list of invocations performed on this entity (considered as the receiver) (receivingInvocations). Finally, I provide simple name for the entity I represent. The pattern is that name returns the local name of the entity.

1 0

why do we need a sourcedEntity in a sourcelanguage?
by Stéphane Ducasse 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi I'm reading SourceLanguage and I was wondering why why do we need sourcedEntities from the sourceLanguage. I do not get its use. Stef

2 2

moose data analysis exporter (xml or other...)
by mpescuma 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Hi all, I'm a developer that needs to produce (starting from a java project) and import moose data analysis into a own program (written into java or c++). Exists a api moose library (a .dll or somethings of equivalent) that can be linked to my program or can the moose data analysis exported into a xml or equivalent file format ? Can the moose be launched as a command with an stdout without use a user interface or gui ? Thanks, Michele -- View this message in context: http://moose-dev.97923.n3.nabble.com/moose-data-analysis-exporter-xml-or-ot… Sent from the moose-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

4 13

Issue 713 in moose-technology: Smart analyzer for the MSE reader
by moose-technology＠googlecode.com 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Status: New Owner: ---- Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 713 by alexandr...(a)gmail.com: Smart analyzer for the MSE reader http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=713 it would be nice to have some information in MSE, but until now at least, we did not find an easy solution. One thing we can do easily though is to build a smart analyzer that does not build the meta-model, only traverses the header of entities to recover the types. Anyone would like to take a shot at this? We should create an issue.

1 3

FM3PropertyDescription>>packageOf
by Stéphane Ducasse 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

I suggest that we add to FM3 something like that packagePragma ^ Pragma inMethod: (self mmClass implementingClass >>self implementingSelector) named: #package: package ^ look for FM3Package... if we agree I will write some tests soon. Stef

1 0

is there a way to access the defining class of a property?
by Stéphane Ducasse 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

3 2

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev September 2011