Hello,
I would like to know what is the container of a FAMIXImplicitVariable?
In meta-model I see a FAMIXType as the container of a FAMIXImplicitVariable,
but when I load a Smalltalk model I see a FAMIXMethod as container of a
FAMIXImplicitVariable.
--
Andre Hora
Hello you all,
Just wanted to ask a question. When I¹m using Moose it displays, in the list
of entities, twice the entry ³famixclasses (x)² (Have a look at the attached
printscreen). Is this normal, or am I doing something wrong. Using version
4.1, tried it on mac and on windows pc, same behavior.... Just imported some
arbitrary smalltalk project.
Cheers,
Daniel
Hi,
I am trying to find studies regarding the choice of colors for syntax highlighting. Does anyone know any publications in this area?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"It's not what we do that matters most, it's how we do it."
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium Component-Glamour
New issue 523 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Selection actions should disable
the shortcut when no selection exists
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=523
The morphic renderer does not disable the shortcut for an action when no
selection exists.
Hi Alexandre,
Some of my visualizations that are using #draggable are raising the error: MOEdge does not understand #translateBy:bounded:
Did #draggable and #nodraggable change?
Regards,
Veronica
Moose Chef is now part of Famix Core. A page describing the library and its usage is available at http://www.moosetechnology.org/docs/famix/MooseChef
(basically the same stuff that was described in my mails a few days ago)
--
Simon Denier
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Component-Famix Milestone-4.3
New issue 522 by tudor.gi...(a)gmail.com: Add Enum and EnumValue to FAMIX
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=522
The following Java snippet should be modeled with an Enum and 7 EnumValues.
The Enum should be a type and the EnumValue should have a parentEnum
pointing to the Enum.
public enum Day {
SUNDAY, MONDAY, TUESDAY, WEDNESDAY,
THURSDAY, FRIDAY, SATURDAY
}
Alexandre and Doru,
I see your point, and I see many other open source projects mixing
issue notifications with the real development mails,
thus corroborating it.
However, I would say that the best setup would be using two different
mailing lists,
because many of the issue notifications are not informative at all
(e.g., "Issue #x fixed.")
and you get a wrong idea of how much "real" discussion is going on the list.
Other projects, such as ArgoUML adopt the multi lists approach. For
example Argo has these lists:
org.tigris.argouml.announce
org.tigris.argouml.commits
org.tigris.argouml.dev
org.tigris.argouml.issues
org.tigris.argouml.modules-dev
org.tigris.argouml.users
I've seen development mailing lists without discussions but with 2000
emails per month
generated only by the issue tracking system. If this will be the case
with moose-dev,
(and many of the emails are really generated by the issue tracker) I
would try to consider
something different from mailing lists to coordinate.
In any case, this is my opinion, and it's up to you to decide.
Of course, I can always filter emails out ;)
Thanks for reading.
Cheers,
Alberto
On 7 February 2011 14:20, Alexandre Bergel <alexandre(a)bergel.eu> wrote:
> I personally like the current setting. You can always filter out the mails you do not want to see
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>
> Le 7 févr. 2011 à 06:35, Alberto Bacchelli <alberto.bacchelli(a)usi.ch> a écrit :
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Why is the issue tracking system sending messages to this mailing list?
>>
>> Wouldn't it be better to have a second mailing list for issue notifications,
>> so that moose-dev does not receive so many messages?
>>
>> We can always discuss here the issues that are worth-discussing,
>> just by forwarding emails from the "issue notifications" mailing list to here.
>>
>> Just in my humble opinion.
>>
>> Alberto
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
Hi all,
Why is the issue tracking system sending messages to this mailing list?
Wouldn't it be better to have a second mailing list for issue notifications,
so that moose-dev does not receive so many messages?
We can always discuss here the issues that are worth-discussing,
just by forwarding emails from the "issue notifications" mailing list to here.
Just in my humble opinion.
Alberto