Preparing Mondrian for 4.0
by Alexandre Bergel
Hi!
Yesterday Doru gave me some bug reports. I wrote tests that identify
them and subsequently killed the bugs.
If you have encountered some bugs in Mondrian and you haven't reported
them, please report them asap.
I know that Mondrian has seen a decrease in its performances recently.
I am currently working on it. But is there something else ?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
13 years, 7 months
Mondrian-Alexandre_Bergel.426
by Tudor Girba
Hi Alex,
Mondrian-Alexandre_Bergel.426 is not part of the latest ancestry. Is
this by intent or by mistake?
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Speaking louder won't make the point worthier."
13 years, 7 months
Adding accessing methods
by Alexandre Bergel
hi!
What about adding in FAMIXClass:
withAllSubclasses, allSubclasses, superclasses, withAllSuperclasses,
allSuperclasses
FAMIXClass should be somewhat polymorphic to Behavior.
That would be useful... I can do it.
Any opinion?
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
13 years, 7 months
First pass for generic DSM
by Laval Jannik
Hi all,
I am trying to make DSM generic.
In the last version of DSM, we can make a DSM based on nodes and edges.
Only the basic DSM works on it (dsm with colors). And I have to debug the interaction of the visualization.
In the package DSMCore, I made a class DSMExample with, for now, 2 examples.
Here is an example:
====
dSMMatrix := DSMMatrix withNodes: #(#1 #2 #3) edges: #(#(#1 #2) #(#2 #1) #(#3 #1)).
view := MOViewRenderer new.
DSMVisualization new
open: dSMMatrix
on: view.
view open
====
We make a DSM with nodes and a collection of edges. An edge is a collection of two elements: the source and the target.
I think I will do a third element to add informations for other DSM.
You can try it, and make comments.
I will pay attention to your idea to have a better generic DSM.
Cheers
---
Jannik Laval
13 years, 7 months
Cobol to MOOSE?
by Stephan Eggermont
What support for Cobol is available in MOOSE? Is there a MSE generator,
or do I need to build my own parser/generator?
Stephan Eggermont
13 years, 7 months
About Configuration
by stephane ducasse
Alex
is it on purpose that the default mondrian configuration of load 17 and that in the metacelloRepository you have 5 or 6 more
recent ones?
It is important to consider that you should publish in Mondrian and copy in metacelloRepository.
MetacelloRepository can disappear tomorrow.
Stef
13 years, 7 months
Smalltalk Syntax (was: Re: Re: First pass for generic DSM)
by Lukas Renggli
>> dSMMatrix := DSMMatrix withNodes: #(#1 #2 #3) edges: #(#(#1 #2) #(#2 #1)
>> #(#3 #1)).
Just as a side remark, but I already stumbled several times over code
like the above in Mondrian and Glamour:
#1 " is not valid Smalltalk "
It does not parse with any parser other then the default one in
Pharo/Squeak. Up until a few minutes ago it broke the refactoring
engine badly. Pharo strangely compiles the above expression to the
number 1. So why not just put the number, which also saves you one
character?
1 " is a valid number "
To get a symbol with 1 you need to put the number in quotes:
#'1' " is a valid symbol "
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch
13 years, 7 months
Glamour - GLMTablePresentation columns name
by Cyrille Delaunay
Hello,
I'm building a browser with gamour and I use a GLMTablePresentation.
There is a thing I would like to do:
I would like to set a specific name to my GLMTablePresentation colums
according the output value send from another presentation of the browser.
The first intuition I had was to specify the name of the column using a
block:
GLMTablePresentation new
column: [:input | input anyOne class asString].
but we can't do that.
Is it possible to do it in another way?
13 years, 7 months
glamour tree children by level
by Tudor Girba
Hi,
I added the possibility to specify the children of a tree also based
on the level at which the item resides.
An example can be found here:
GLMBasicExamples>>treeWithChildrenByLevel
Stef, this solves a problem of easily showing both categories and
selectors (both being represented by symbols) in the same tree :).
Cheers,
Doru
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"There are no old things, there are only old ways of looking at them."
13 years, 7 months
Classes without #annotation
by Simon Denier
Hi
I notice that the following classes are not described in Fame. Now they are Group classes, so it's not so important as instances are dynamically created. However, MooseGroup and similar are described. So should we be consistent with the rule?
DudeDuplicationGroup
DudeMultiplicationGroup
FAMIXFileGroup
FAMIXFolderGroup
FAMIXGlobalVariableGroup
FAMIXNamespaceGroup
--
Simon
13 years, 7 months
