Moose-dev January 2009

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

14 participants
18 discussions

strange thing
by Adrian DOZSA 21 Jan '09

21 Jan '09

Hi everybody, Playing around with the FAMIX 2 specs and the LAN model I found something very strange: - I found an FAMIXAccess that accesses a FAMIXClass. According to the FAMIX 2 meta-model and also the annotations from Moose the accesses attribute of FAMIXAccess should be of type FAMIXAbstractStructuralEntity. But the FAMIXAccess instance with id 71 from LAN model accesses a FAMIXClass (Root::Smalltalk::LAN::LANInterface.initialize() -> DependentList_class). There are other examples too. How were those accesses build? It is correct? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

3 2

SqMoose - test assertions do not match current test model?
by Simon Denier 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Sorry, it's gonna be very specific. I'm running and debugging the tests of FamixPropertiesTest>>testAttributeMetrics, which tests the computation of basic metrics on Famix entities (like numberOfAccesses). In many cases, the value against which the model is tested seems outdated. For example: attribute1 := self model entityNamed: #'Smalltalk::LANInterface.nextNode'. self assert: attribute1 numberOfAccesses = 4. attribute1 numberOfAccesses returns 3 and I checked with the model, LANInterface.nextNode, it is correct (nextNode is only accessed in its accessor) So I wonder where the value 4 comes from? -- Simon

1 0

FAMIX30 Question
by Stéphane Ducasse 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

Doru I thought that we renamed outgoingInheritances into superclassInheritances so that we can write to get the superclasses self superclassInheritances collect: [:each | each superclass] is it true?

2 1

[SqMoose] MooseLoader load :)
by Stéphane Ducasse 20 Jan '09

20 Jan '09

1 0

Re: FAMIX 3.0 status
by Adrian DOZSA 12 Jan '09

12 Jan '09

Hi Doru, I only asked because I would need FAMIX to extend it to an JEE meta-model. And FAMIX 3.0 looks nicer that v2.0. But I don't think I could implement FAMIX 3.0 (because of time and knowledge constraints). Adi D. > Hi Adrian, > > At this moment, there is not a working FAMIX 3.0 in VW. However, the > mechanism is very much in place. If you are interested in investing a > little effort it should be not difficult to make it work. > > Cheers, > Doru > ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

2 1

Re: FAMIX 3.0 status
by Adrian DOZSA 10 Jan '09

10 Jan '09

Hi Stef, > Hi adi > > for now in VW you will not get FAMIX30 except if you port it and > integrate it. Unfortunately I am not that well accustomed with Moose, nor I have that much spare time. > For the Squeak version we made progress we have FAMIX20 and FAMIX30 > and we can extract Smalltalk code in FAMIX30. > > Stef > Considering that the new FAMIX30 is only developed in the Squeak version and that as I have seen lately on this mailing list most of the development efforts are moved to the Squeak version, should i understand that the Squeak version is/will be the primary/reference Moose implementation? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

3 2

FAMIX 3.0 status
by Adrian DOZSA 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Hi all, Which is the status of FAMIX 3.0? The website mentions a beta 14 version. How can i import FAMIX 3.0 meta-modelsinto Moose? because momentarily I get an error when a FAMIX 3.0 entity is found. And which are the short/medium term plans? stick with FAMIX 2 or migrate to v3? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Software Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

2 1

Fwd: 54202 (Modified) (C) Error in RBParser patchLiteralArray
by stéphane ducasse 07 Jan '09

07 Jan '09

Begin forwarded message: > From: MARS(a)cincom.com > Date: January 7, 2009 6:47:31 PM CEST > To: sdahl(a)goshawk.com, s(a)xss.de, tgriggs(a)cincom.com, smichael(a)cincom.com > , aknight(a)cincom.com, mlucas-smith(a)cincom.com, ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch, mkobetic(a)cincom.com > , holger(a)heeg.de > Subject: 54202 (Modified) (C) Error in RBParser patchLiteralArray > > > > The URL to view this AR is: http://cosmo.cincom.com:8008/launch/MARS/54202 > > This AR is currently: inReview > This AR is assigned to: dahl > > > :: Modified with by hguhl on January 7, 2009 9:47:29.748 > :: Changed Inform Field (s(a)xss.de TOOLS ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch sdahl > FORREVIEW tgriggs->s(a)xss.de TOOLS ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch sdahl > FORREVIEW tgriggs hguhl) > :: Changed Links (->FR:88734) > :: Text Appended > > > Added the FR link.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev January 2009