Moose-dev January 2009

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

14 participants
18 discussions

by Adrian DOZSA

Hi everybody, Playing around with the FAMIX 2 specs and the LAN model I found something very strange: - I found an FAMIXAccess that accesses a FAMIXClass. According to the FAMIX 2 meta-model and also the annotations from Moose the accesses attribute of FAMIXAccess should be of type FAMIXAbstractStructuralEntity. But the FAMIXAccess instance with id 71 from LAN model accesses a FAMIXClass (Root::Smalltalk::LAN::LANInterface.initialize() -> DependentList_class). There are other examples too. How were those accesses build? It is correct? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

15 years, 11 months

SqMoose - test assertions do not match current test model?

by Simon Denier

Sorry, it's gonna be very specific. I'm running and debugging the tests of FamixPropertiesTest>>testAttributeMetrics, which tests the computation of basic metrics on Famix entities (like numberOfAccesses). In many cases, the value against which the model is tested seems outdated. For example: attribute1 := self model entityNamed: #'Smalltalk::LANInterface.nextNode'. self assert: attribute1 numberOfAccesses = 4. attribute1 numberOfAccesses returns 3 and I checked with the model, LANInterface.nextNode, it is correct (nextNode is only accessed in its accessor) So I wonder where the value 4 comes from? -- Simon

15 years, 11 months

FAMIX30 Question

by Stéphane Ducasse

Doru I thought that we renamed outgoingInheritances into superclassInheritances so that we can write to get the superclasses self superclassInheritances collect: [:each | each superclass] is it true?

15 years, 11 months

[SqMoose] MooseLoader load :)

by Stéphane Ducasse

15 years, 11 months

Re: FAMIX 3.0 status

by Adrian DOZSA

Hi Doru, I only asked because I would need FAMIX to extend it to an JEE meta-model. And FAMIX 3.0 looks nicer that v2.0. But I don't think I could implement FAMIX 3.0 (because of time and knowledge constraints). Adi D. > Hi Adrian, > > At this moment, there is not a working FAMIX 3.0 in VW. However, the > mechanism is very much in place. If you are interested in investing a > little effort it should be not difficult to make it work. > > Cheers, > Doru > ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

15 years, 11 months

Re: FAMIX 3.0 status

by Adrian DOZSA

Hi Stef, > Hi adi > > for now in VW you will not get FAMIX30 except if you port it and > integrate it. Unfortunately I am not that well accustomed with Moose, nor I have that much spare time. > For the Squeak version we made progress we have FAMIX20 and FAMIX30 > and we can extract Smalltalk code in FAMIX30. > > Stef > Considering that the new FAMIX30 is only developed in the Squeak version and that as I have seen lately on this mailing list most of the development efforts are moved to the Squeak version, should i understand that the Squeak version is/will be the primary/reference Moose implementation? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Programming Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

15 years, 11 months

FAMIX 3.0 status

by Adrian DOZSA

Hi all, Which is the status of FAMIX 3.0? The website mentions a beta 14 version. How can i import FAMIX 3.0 meta-modelsinto Moose? because momentarily I get an error when a FAMIX 3.0 entity is found. And which are the short/medium term plans? stick with FAMIX 2 or migrate to v3? Thanks, Adi D. ------------------------------ dipl.ing. Adrian DOZSA Software Engineer mail: adi.dozsa(a)gmail.com web: http://adi.dozsa.googlepages.com/

15 years, 11 months

Fwd: 54202 (Modified) (C) Error in RBParser patchLiteralArray

by stéphane ducasse

Begin forwarded message: > From: MARS(a)cincom.com > Date: January 7, 2009 6:47:31 PM CEST > To: sdahl(a)goshawk.com, s(a)xss.de, tgriggs(a)cincom.com, smichael(a)cincom.com > , aknight(a)cincom.com, mlucas-smith(a)cincom.com, ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch, mkobetic(a)cincom.com > , holger(a)heeg.de > Subject: 54202 (Modified) (C) Error in RBParser patchLiteralArray > > > > The URL to view this AR is: http://cosmo.cincom.com:8008/launch/MARS/54202 > > This AR is currently: inReview > This AR is assigned to: dahl > > > :: Modified with by hguhl on January 7, 2009 9:47:29.748 > :: Changed Inform Field (s(a)xss.de TOOLS ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch sdahl > FORREVIEW tgriggs->s(a)xss.de TOOLS ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch sdahl > FORREVIEW tgriggs hguhl) > :: Changed Links (->FR:88734) > :: Text Appended > > > Added the FR link.

15 years, 11 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

Moose-dev January 2009