Hi,
Just for the record, the jobs are:
Moose 5.1 - loads #stable on top of Pharo 4
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-5.1/
Moose 6.0 - loads #development on top of Pharo 5
https://ci.inria.fr/moose/job/moose-6.0/
Cheers,
Doru
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Andrei Chis <chisvasileandrei(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Now we are not using the Moose 5.1 from CI for development.
Still I expect the CI job to keep building a working image.
I just tried the latest image from the CI and I see no problem with cmd+g
in the Playground.
In what pharo image are you loading Moose 5.1?
Cheers,
Andrei
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Serge Stinckwich <
serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm using usually the last MOOSE 5.1 image available in the CI
> throught Pharo Launcher.
> Recent MOOSE 5.1 have problems. For example 3 CMD-G in a Playground
> return a DNU, because String>>findAnySubStr: delimiters startingAt:
> start has been renamed in Pharo 5.0 into
> findAnySubStrinhg: delimiters startingAt: start
>
> I guess I should not use these images anymore, but why they are build
> on the CI ?
>
> The MOOSE 5.1 image should be labelled as stable in Pharo Launcher also.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Serge Stinckwich
> UCBN & UMI UMMISCO 209 (IRD/UPMC)
> Every DSL ends up being Smalltalk
>
http://www.doesnotunderstand.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Every thing has its own flow"