Hi Serge, one could ask Jan Vrany about it :). Jan, is that Ok if someone reuse this code (as in adding a Ruby parser to the SmaCC collection) ? Thierry 2016-06-17 12:18 GMT+02:00 Serge Stinckwich <serge.stinckwich(a)gmail.com>om>:

On Jun 17, 2016, at 2:28 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi Jan, 2016-06-17 14:20 GMT+02:00 Jan Vrany <jan.vrany(a)fit.cvut.cz>cz>: Hi, yes, that's perfectly fine! Thanks. However, calling it "a complete Ruby parser done with SmaCC" is bit too optimistic. It is not complete and never was. Ruby's quite challenging with that respect (well, in many in fact :-) I saw that there are a lot of unimplemented stuff in the grammar... or at least messages saying so :) If it's for analysis (i.e., you want to build FAMIX model and then analyse it), If I were you I'd just use a Ruby parser in Ruby (there are many), let it spit out sexprs and parse them in Smalltalk and make FAMIX model out of that. If you manage to fix the SmaCC parser, I;d be __very__ interested. Please let me know. I will if I do. Good luck! Thanks, Thierry Jan On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Thierry Goubier <thierry.goubier(a)gmail.com> wrote: _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev