27 Nov
2009
27 Nov
'09
8:46 p.m.
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
27 Nov
27 Nov
9:09 p.m.
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to
announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some
analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version with
metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or the
baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation - have to
think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local
variables or parameters for now (which might be interested for type
usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the importer deals
with all possible ways of declaring a function or a variable or
something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:16 p.m.
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
:)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to announce that the
metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some specifications of CA
entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working analyzer.
Why a 1.3
Did you change the architecture?
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new
version with metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or the
baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation - have to think of a
better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local variables or
parameters for now (which might be interested for type usage information). Also there is
no guarantee that the importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a
variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
Ok I will try
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
9:23 p.m.
That sounds great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
- change the annotation to be 'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke "Spawn
New Version"
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to
announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some
analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version with
metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or
the baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation -
have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local
variables or parameters for now (which might be interested for type
usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the importer
deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a variable
or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:27 p.m.
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:23 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
That sounds great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
but normally the baseline should rarely changes so I do not get it.
- change the annotation to be
'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke "Spawn New
Version"
what does it
generate a new version with the versions number?
Stef
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to announce that the
metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some specifications of CA
entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version with metacello. Right now
I copy-paste the previous version method (or the baseline) and perform the 'update
package methods' operation - have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local variables or
parameters for now (which might be interested for type usage information). Also there is
no guarantee that the importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a
variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:29 p.m.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 17:16, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
Simon
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
nope, it's still based on baseline 1.2, it's just a new version (btw,
I dont see a diff between baseline 1.1 and 1.2)
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
:)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to
announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some
analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
Why a 1.3
Did you change the architecture? (BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create
a new version with
metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or
the baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation -
have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local
variables or parameters for now (which might be interested for type
usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the importer
deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a variable
or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
Ok I will try
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:38 p.m.
Hi Stef,
If you are sure it did not change, than just use the baseline already
present.
Yes. It will ask for the baseline to read from and then it will
generate a new method with hardcoded Monticello version numbers.
Cheers,
Doru
That sounds
great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
but normally the baseline should rarely changes so I do not get it. - change the
annotation to be 'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke
"Spawn New Version"
what does it
generate a new version with the versions number? Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased
to announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform
some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version
with metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method
(or the baseline) and perform the 'update package methods'
operation - have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import
local variables or parameters for now (which might be interested
for type usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the
importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a
variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data
sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
> Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
> Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
> hi alex
>
> did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-
> project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:39 p.m.
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:29 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
On 27 nov. 2009, at 17:16, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
strange because it changes rio -> filesystem?
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Simon Denier wrote:
nope, it's still based on baseline 1.2, it's just a new version (btw, I dont see
a diff between baseline 1.1 and 1.2)
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
:)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to announce that the
metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some specifications of CA
entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working analyzer.
Why a 1.3
Did you change the architecture? (BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create
a new version with metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or the
baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation - have to think of a
better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local variables or
parameters for now (which might be interested for type usage information). Also there is
no guarantee that the importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a
variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
Ok I will try
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
> Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
> Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
> Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>
> hi alex
>
> did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
>
> Stef
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pharo-project mailing list
> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
9:44 p.m.
Cool
now I do not understand why self loadVersion: '1.3' does not load anything.
Simon did you try it?
Stef
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
Hi Stef,
If you are sure it did not change, than just use the baseline already present.
Yes. It will ask for the baseline to read from and then it will generate a new method
with hardcoded Monticello version numbers.
Cheers,
Doru
That
sounds great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
but normally the baseline should rarely changes so I do not get it. - change
the annotation to be 'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke "Spawn New
Version"
what does it
generate a new version with the versions number? Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to announce that the
metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some specifications of CA
entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version with metacello. Right now
I copy-paste the previous version method (or the baseline) and perform the 'update
package methods' operation - have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local variables or
parameters for now (which might be interested for type usage information). Also there is
no guarantee that the importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a
variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>> From: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
>> Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
>> To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
>> Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
>> Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>
>> hi alex
>>
>> did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
>>
>> Stef
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pharo-project mailing list
>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
11:53 p.m.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 17:39, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
nope, it's still based on baseline 1.2, it's just a new version
(btw, I dont see a diff between baseline 1.1 and 1.2)
strange because it changes rio -> filesystem?
ah yes, I overlooked that.
--
Simon
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased
to announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform
some analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
Why a 1.3
Did you change the architecture?
11:56 p.m.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 17:23, Tudor Girba wrote:
That sounds great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
- change the annotation to be 'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke
"Spawn New Version"
Ah yes, I was looking at an old description of the tools and overshot
this choice.
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
--
Simon
Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
So...
After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased to
announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to perform some
analysis.
See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
specifications of CA entities.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
(BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version with
metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version method (or
the baseline) and perform the 'update package methods' operation -
have to think of a better name).
It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import local
variables or parameters for now (which might be interested for type
usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the importer
deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or a variable
or something else, because of the syntax of the xml data sources.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Begin forwarded message:
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev From: Stéphane Ducasse
<stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
hi alex
did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
Stef
_______________________________________________
Pharo-project mailing list
Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
28 Nov
28 Nov
12:08 a.m.
On 27 nov. 2009, at 17:44, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
Cool
now I do not understand why self loadVersion: '1.3' does not load
anything.
Simon did you try it?
yes it works in my image. Be sure to start from a recent Moose version
also (ConfigurationOfMoose updateDefault from a beta2).
Stef
On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:38 PM, Tudor Girba wrote:
--
Simon
Hi Stef,
If you are sure it did not change, than just use the baseline
already present.
Yes. It will ask for the baseline to read from and then it will
generate a new method with hardcoded Monticello version numbers.
Cheers,
Doru
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev That
sounds great!
For Metacello release, I have the following process:
- copy the current default into a new method called baselineXXX
but normally the baseline should rarely changes so I do not get it. - change
the annotation to be 'VERSION.MINORVERSION-baseline'
- select the Configuration class in OBSystemBrowser, and invoke
"Spawn New Version"
what does it
generate a new version with the versions number? Stef
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Yesterday is a fact.
Tomorrow is a possibility.
Today is a challenge."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
Cheers,
Doru
On 27 Nov 2009, at 21:09, Simon Denier wrote:
>
> Some people are a bit too hurried in this list :)
>
> So...
>
> After a week of work and discussion, we (Alex and I) are pleased
> to announce that the metamodel for C looks good enough to
> perform some analysis.
>
> See the tests in CAnalyzerTest:test famix integration for some
> specifications of CA entities.
>
> I also updated the Configuration so
> ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a
> working analyzer.
>
> (BTW, I am not sure about the best way to create a new version
> with metacello. Right now I copy-paste the previous version
> method (or the baseline) and perform the 'update package
> methods' operation - have to think of a better name).
>
> It's neither perfect nor complete: for example we dont import
> local variables or parameters for now (which might be interested
> for type usage information). Also there is no guarantee that the
> importer deals with all possible ways of declaring a function or
> a variable or something else, because of the syntax of the xml
> data sources.
>
>
> On 27 nov. 2009, at 16:46, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> From: Stéphane Ducasse <stephane.ducasse(a)inria.fr>
>>> Date: November 27, 2009 8:25:02 PM GMT+01:00
>>> To: Pharo Development <Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr>
>>> Subject: [Pharo-project] new version of CAnalyzer?
>>> Reply-To: Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>>
>>> hi alex
>>>
>>> did you publish a new version of the configurationOfCanalyzer?
>>>
>>> Stef
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pharo-project mailing list
>>> Pharo-project(a)lists.gforge.inria.fr
>>> http://lists.gforge.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pharo-project
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Moose-dev mailing list
>> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Moose-dev mailing list
> Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Sometimes the best solution is not the best solution."
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev 
30 Nov
30 Nov
2:56 p.m.
I also updated the Configuration so
ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer loadVersion: '1.3' should load a working
analyzer.
I updated the version 1.3 of ConfigurationOfCAnalyzer. It now uses the
last version of XML-Parser and Pastell. I fixed some brocken tests in
these packages (without touching the base code however).
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
5261
days inactive
5264
days old
13 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Simon Denier -
Stéphane Ducasse -
Tudor Girba