13 Apr
2010
13 Apr
'10
3:19 p.m.
Hi!
Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and
closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I would
like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some remote pair
programming.
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
13 Apr
13 Apr
4:12 p.m.
On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
Hi!
Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and closed the one that
were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
Hi Alex
Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the remaining issues.
I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I would like to see Moose
4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some remote pair programming.
Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very annoying for me :)
--
Simon
8:26 p.m.
Hi,
As I see it the only critical issue that is hard is:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=293
This is hard because I do not know what causes it. I will give it
another try on Wednesday/Thursday, but if it does not work, I will
move it to 4.1.
Alex, it would be great if you could take a look at:
http://code.google.com/p/moose-technology/issues/detail?id=177
This is preventing us to create figures that are defined via the
FormsBuilder and that also have nested graphs. For example, right now,
a UML Class is implemented by hardcoding the methods in the shape.
This means that we cannot click on the methods inside.
Cheers,
Doru
On 13 Apr 2010, at 16:12, Simon Denier wrote:
On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
www.tudorgirba.com
"Problem solving should be concentrated on describing
the problem in a way that is relevant for the solution."
Hi!
Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and
closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
Hi Alex
Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the
remaining issues.
I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I
would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some
remote pair programming.
Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very
annoying for me :)
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
8:31 p.m.
I will work on these...
Alexandre
On 13 Apr 2010, at 10:12, Simon Denier wrote:
On 13 avr. 2010, at 15:19, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
Hi!
Where are we with the release? I checked the remaining issues and
closed the one that were fixed or that I cannot reproduce.
Hi Alex
Doru is coming tomorrow for 2 days so we will try to kill the
remaining issues.
I am not expert in Glamour or the lazy group definition, but I
would like to see Moose 4.0 out. How can I help? We can do some
remote pair programming.
Well, I would like your comment on issue 353 because this is very
annoying for me :)
--
Simon
_______________________________________________
Moose-dev mailing list
Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev
5138
days inactive
5138
days old
3 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alexandre Bergel -
Simon Denier -
Tudor Girba