what will happen if stub do not have belongsTo?

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

older

EMOF.Comment

Re: Inheritance Definition - Again

Stéphane Ducasse

18 May 2007 18 May '07

3:01 p.m.

I do not remember :) and in the ST extractor I reified all the namespaces (and forgot what is happening for the root). Stef

Show replies by date

Tudor Girba

18 May 18 May

3:09 p.m.

Hi Stef, The convention is that a root namespace has a nil "belongsTo". In any case, "belongsTo" has no relationship with "stub". Doru On May 18, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

I do not remember :) and in the ST extractor I reified all the namespaces (and forgot what is happening for the root). Stef _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)iam.unibe.ch https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/moose-dev

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "To lead is not to demand things, is to make them happen."

Stéphane Ducasse

9:53 p.m.

Sure this is not what I implying. I was wondering if we can import a class or entity requiring a belongsTo and that this field is empty (most of the time this is true with stubs)

...

Hi Stef, The convention is that a root namespace has a nil "belongsTo". In any case, "belongsTo" has no relationship with "stub". Doru On May 18, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "To lead is not to demand things, is to make them happen."

Tudor Girba

19 May 19 May

12:20 a.m.

Hi, Now I think I understand the question better. At this time, as we do not depend on unique names when manipulating data, belongsTo is no longer a special relationship. As such, it is no longer mandatory from the point of view of the execution of the browser, although to preserve the semantics of analyses that require a namespace for a class, it is better to create an unknown namespace when you do not have one and add all the stub classes to that one. I hope I got it right this time :) Cheers, Doru On May 18, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

...

Sure this is not what I implying. I was wondering if we can import a class or entity requiring a belongsTo and that this field is empty (most of the time this is true with stubs)

Hi Stef, The convention is that a root namespace has a nil "belongsTo". In any case, "belongsTo" has no relationship with "stub". Doru On May 18, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "To lead is not to demand things, is to make them happen."

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "Being happy is a matter of choice."

Stéphane Ducasse

9:39 a.m.

Indeed this was my question :) Stef On 19 mai 07, at 00:20, Tudor Girba wrote:

...

Sure this is not what I implying. I was wondering if we can import a class or entity requiring a belongsTo and that this field is empty (most of the time this is true with stubs)

Hi Stef, The convention is that a root namespace has a nil "belongsTo". In any case, "belongsTo" has no relationship with "stub". Doru On May 18, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Stéphane Ducasse wrote:

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "To lead is not to demand things, is to make them happen."

-- Tudor Girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba www.iam.unibe.ch/~girba/blog/ "Being happy is a matter of choice."

6211

days inactive

6212

days old

moose-dev@list.inf.unibe.ch

Manage subscription

4 comments

2 participants

tags (0)

participants (2)

Stéphane Ducasse
Tudor Girba