On 23 Sep 2017, at 20:03, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi, Can someone explain the real interest to get a dictionary for properties and a dictionary for queries in the MooseDefaultState?

Is there a downside to merge both? I did some tests by creating a SYNState using a single dictionary for both properties and queries. Here is the memory impact: MooseDefaultState ------------------- Image without model : 263Mo

Image with model : 605Mo Image with model and default synectique caches : 650Mo

Image with model, default caches and after using the application : 792Mo SYNState ------------------- Image without model : 263Mo Image with model : 589Mo

Image with model and default synectique caches : 575Mo (There was probably a full GC that garbaged the temporary object of the import) Image with model, default caches and after using the application : 706Mo We see a clear gain of memory. (I did exactly the same interactions in both try) We might be interested by this at Synectique. This is why I would like to know the reasons to have two different dictionaries since there is no class comment. If the difference will not impact our tools I'll make the default state configurable and I will introduce this SYNState renaming it "MooseMemoryEfficientState" if it is fine with everyone. Thank you in advance for the infos.

-- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr http://www.synectique.eu 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev

On 23 Sep 2017, at 20:03, Cyril Ferlicot D. <cyril.ferlicot(a)gmail.com> wrote: Hi, Can someone explain the real interest to get a dictionary for properties and a dictionary for queries in the MooseDefaultState? Is there a downside to merge both? I did some tests by creating a SYNState using a single dictionary for both properties and queries. Here is the memory impact: MooseDefaultState ------------------- Image without model : 263Mo Image with model : 605Mo Image with model and default synectique caches : 650Mo Image with model, default caches and after using the application : 792Mo SYNState ------------------- Image without model : 263Mo Image with model : 589Mo Image with model and default synectique caches : 575Mo (There was probably a full GC that garbaged the temporary object of the import) Image with model, default caches and after using the application : 706Mo We see a clear gain of memory. (I did exactly the same interactions in both try) We might be interested by this at Synectique. This is why I would like to know the reasons to have two different dictionaries since there is no class comment. If the difference will not impact our tools I'll make the default state configurable and I will introduce this SYNState renaming it "MooseMemoryEfficientState" if it is fine with everyone. Thank you in advance for the infos. -- Cyril Ferlicot https://ferlicot.fr http://www.synectique.eu 2 rue Jacques Prévert 01, 59650 Villeneuve d'ascq France _______________________________________________ Moose-dev mailing list Moose-dev(a)list.inf.unibe.ch https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/moose-dev