Ciao Dale, thanks. I have no great experience in managing this type of updates. I had some considerations. Ok. I have no idea about it...... how should I proceed? But what do you mean? That you can port ( the GsDevKit/Magritte3 work into the magritte-metamodel/magritte project ) within a week?

Ciao  Dale,  thanks. What I have developed is based on Seaside and Magritte and for now I am not able to review and change the reference base. I would like and would be useful to continue in this direction. in this case, I don't know if feasible but: Set the development environment based on Pharo 7.0.3 (it seems stable) and install Magritte from ConfigurationOfMagritte3to the version compatible with GsDevKit / Magritte. If you tell me the relative ConfigurationOfMagritte3 versionof GsDevKit / Magritte I can try to set the Pharo 7.0.3 environment in this regard. This seems to me the best solution. That can be useful also for the porting of Pier (which if I remember correctly is based on Magritte) ???? In this case I wonder if I can be useful? Other considerations? Thanks, Dario _______________________________________________ Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/smallwiki

Dario, I've created an issue[1] to track the project and started the port of magritte-metamodel/magritte on my fork of the project[2]. If you follow along in Issue #105[1], I'll record progress in commits and comments on the issue ... Dale [1] https://github.com/magritte-metamodel/magritte/issues/105 [2] https://github.com/dalehenrich/magritte/tree/issue_105 On 5/2/19 8:08 AM, dtrussardi(a)tiscali.it wrote: > Ciao  Dale, > >  thanks. >> >> >> On 5/1/19 8:58 AM, dtrussardi(a)tiscali.it wrote: >>> Ciao Dale, thanks. >>> >>> I have no great experience in managing this type of updates. >>> I had some considerations. >>>> >>>> I've looked at this a bit closer and I notice that you are >>>> referencing the magritte-metamodel/magritte[1] and that project >>>> has not been ported to GLASS yet ... A quick way to tell if a >>>> particular project has been ported to GLASS is to look at the >>>> .travis.yml[2] file and check to see if there are any GemStone >>>> versions being tested. >>>> >>> Ok. >>>> >>>> The GsDevKit/Magrite3[3] was ported to GLASS and the test ran >>>> cleanly as of 3 years ago[4]. The project hasn't been updated to >>>> SmalltalkCI and the last version tested was GemStone 3.3.1[5]. I >>>> just triggered a new build to see where the project stands >>>> today[6] - the travis run passed for GemStone 3.2.15 and 3.3.1 ... >>>> >>>> Moving forward, I would think the best bet would be to port the >>>> magritte-metamodel/magritte project to GLASS and GemStone 3.2.17, >>>> 3.3.9, and 3.3.9 ... I assume that Magritte has changed from the >>>> point where I forked Magritte 3.3.0 back in December of 2015 ... >>>> >>>> From the release history[7] of GsDevKit/Magritte3, it looks like I >>>> ported 3.2.0, 3.3.0, 3.3.1, 3.3.2, and 3.4.2. the master branch is >>>> 3.4.2. I also got a start on 3.5.0, but didn't finish the port to >>>> the point where I merged to master ... >>>> >>>> I would think that updating GsDevKit/Magritte3 3.4.2 to support >>>> smalltalkCI and GemStone 3.4.3, would be pretty straightforward ... >>>> >>> I have no idea about it...... how should I proceed? >>> >>> >>>> >>>> The release history of magritte-metamodel/magritte[8] indicates >>>> that 3.5.4 was released in January of this year ... I've launched >>>> another GsDevKit/Magritte3 travis run for branch version_350[9] to >>>> see what the state of the GLASS Magritte3.5.0 port is ... >>>> >>>> It lools like the Magritte 3.5.0 test[9] passes so it is likely >>>> that we'll be able to merge the GsDevKit/Magritte3 work into the >>>> magritte-metamodel/magritte project ... >>>> >>>> I don't have full time to commit to doing this work, but barring >>>> any major surprises between Magritte 3.5.0 and  Magritte 3.5.4 and >>>> later, it should only take a week or so of elapsed time for me to >>>> do the port ... if there are significant changes then all bets are >>>> off ... >>>> >>> But what do you mean? That you can port ( the GsDevKit/Magritte3 >>> work into the magritte-metamodel/magritte project ) within a week? >> >> I don't have a lot of time to mess around with porting projects that >> no one will use, so there are two different routes that I can take: >> > What I have developed is based on Seaside and Magritte and for now I > am not able to review and change the reference base. > > I would like and would be useful to continue in this direction. >> >>     1. Port GsDevKit/Magritte which is known to run on GemStone >> 3.3.x and will likely run on GemStone 3.4.3 without a lot of >> changes. Downside is that it is 4 years old and may not meet your >> requirements. Going this route is likely to take around a week >> elapsed time (not full time). >> > in this case, I don't know if feasible but: Set the development > environment based on Pharo 7.0.3 (it seems stable) and install > Magritte from ConfigurationOfMagritte3to the version compatible with > GsDevKit / Magritte. > > If you tell me the relative ConfigurationOfMagritte3 versionof > GsDevKit / Magritte I can try to set the Pharo 7.0.3 environment in > this regard. > >>     2. Port magritte-metamodel/magritte to GemStone ... there are >> GemStone packages present, in the repository, but GemStone is not in >> the travis lineup, so the GemStone code has not been tested for a >> long time (maybe more than 4 years). Going this route will likely >> take a week (elapsed --- not full time) just to figure out how big >> of a job the port will be ... >> >> You are currently trying to use magritte-metamodel/magritte with >> Pharo 7.0.3, so it seems that the right answer is to spend time >> porting , magritte-metamodel/magritte to GemStone ... then you'll be >> using the same code base on Pharo and GemStone ... if there aren't >> significant changes to Magritte in the last 4 years then a couple of >> weeks would be a good guess ... and I can handle that ... >> > This seems to me the best solution. > > That can be useful also for the porting of Pier (which if I remember > correctly is based on Magritte) ???? > > In this case I wonder if I can be useful? >> >> If this makes sense to you, then I will start work on the port >> tomorrow after I see your email:) >> > Other considerations? > > Thanks, > > Dario > > > _______________________________________________ > Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... > https://www.list.inf.unibe.ch/listinfo/smallwiki