5 May
2009
5 May
'09
6:09 p.m.
I note if you go to the squeak.org website and tap but report it dumps
you into Mantis. However for novices that likely isn't helpful
and the link to a mail message from Feb isn't something anyone is
going to find, or mmm or remember.
On 5-May-09, at 9:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
I'll check it out. Also note that cc-ing
release(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org
will generally be useful.
Cheers,
- Andreas
John M McIntosh wrote:
> Well then for http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581
> who would stick that into 3.11? Let alone that I'm looking at
> 3.10.2 image
> Added (partly)
> http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7348
> On 5-May-09, at 2:07 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
>> Hi John -
>>
>> John M McIntosh wrote:
>>> (I had to fix the sq 3.10.2 image because of ignored bug using
>>> allInstances I reported years back, never fixed, but fixed in
>>> pharo last fall).
>>
>> [... snip ...]
>>
>>> (to be fair here I could bring some fixes into the 3.10.2 image
>>> to reduce the cpu time, but really those fixes should have gone
>>> in years ago...)
>>
>> Just as an FYI, there is now a well-defined process for
>> contributing stuff to 3.11:
>>
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/134095…
>>
>> If these fixes are on Mantis all you need is to provide an
>> installer script and update its status accordingly. Just try it!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - Andreas
--
=
=
=
========================================================================
John M. McIntosh <johnmci(a)smalltalkconsulting.com> Twitter:
squeaker68882
Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com
=
=
=
========================================================================