Re: About store

I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird repository locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run both.

stef said: > I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get > accounts? > Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who > is publishing what. You can install user/group management or not when you setup StORE, this is different from people having user ids and logging in.

The differences is that with the former you have the notion of permissions etc. Since every user needs to have an account you will at least always know who published what unless of course one user figures out the password of the other user.

> No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and > left with this wonderful error meassage. > BTW, just to check, are you using "switch databases"?,

if you are working with more than one StORE repository which I assume you are i.e. the one at the university and Cincom Public repository "switch databases" will maintain you reconciled with all the repositories that you use. You should do this after you connect. I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird repository locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run both.

-Charles On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:06:33 +0200, stéphane ducasse <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: > sorry, is "boom" a good thing? i.e. I usually associate "boom" > with an explosion which is usually not a good thing :) >> >> I'll agree that StORE does not provide good messages but whenever >> you get a once of those not very informative dialogs simply break >> into the process i.e. do a "control Y" , then walk done the stack >> i.e. you should see where the dialog was actually asked to open, >> keep walking to where the code does most probably a "Dialog warn" >> or whatever construction of SimpleDialog and you will see the >> error and of course now you are in a wonderful Smalltalk debugger >> and therefore what is wrong should be quite a bit more apparent. >> Again, I do agree though that the messages that bubble up are not >> all that useful. > > Yes but normally to publish it this should have taken me 3 min and > now I will spent two hours at least. So I will give a try. > But I found that not really professional quality. > >> You are apparently also running the "user management" stuff in >> StORE. I have not yet had a reason to do so. > > I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get > accounts? > Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who > is publishing what. > >> So my question is did Fredericks stuff actually make it into the >> public repository and again if it did does it work with SmallWiki >> 1 ? > > No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and > left with this wonderful error meassage. > > Stef > >> >> thanks >> >> Charles >> >> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:40:30 +0200, stéphane ducasse >> <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: >> >>> Done >>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>> >>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>> >>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>> >>> Hi all this is the wonderful messages I get from store after >>> been disconnected. >>> really since of work. and yes and I also got a nice pop up >>> saying error: nil wonderful, quite user friendly and robust >>> with that. >>> >>> So here is what I did: I reconciled our internal one smallWiki >>> release with one in the cincom database. >>> Then I press release and boom. >>> >>> Stef >> >> >> >> -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: >> http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/