I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird repository locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run both.

I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird repository locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run both.

ok, but please send the info to my home accoount: charles(a)ocit.com, since I will not have the time to do it from here. So the plan would be to load what you have in your repository and then attempt to publish into the Cincom public repository , "switch databases" may do the trick though so let me know, btw can you cleanly load your bundles into a virgin image? It is a useful exercise to do often, keeps one on top of things.

-Charles On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:34:20 +0200, stéphane ducasse <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

I give up sorry I have something else to do than to lose my time with this crappy software. This is the worse smalltalk application I ever see. So I tried to switch databases then I connected to cincom sotre and again the same problems I just lost 30 min in the process. Perfect productivity with this product. So if someone can publish the latest version of SmallWiki from our local store to cincom one as a follow up of the version before the camp version this would be good. Stef On 29 sept. 04, at 18:38, stéphane ducasse wrote:

ok, but please send the info to my home accoount: charles(a)ocit.com, since I will not have the time to do it from here. So the plan would be to load what you have in your repository and then attempt to publish into the Cincom public repository , "switch databases" may do the trick though so let me know, btw can you cleanly load your bundles into a virgin image? It is a useful exercise to do often, keeps one on top of things. -Charles On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:34:20 +0200, stéphane ducasse <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: > > On 29 sept. 04, at 17:08, Charles A. Monteiro wrote: > >> stef said: >> >>> I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get accounts? >>> Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who is >>> publishing what. >> >> You can install user/group management or not when you setup StORE, >> this is different from people having user ids and logging in. > > ok I was not aware of that. We installed it just when we migrated from > 3.0 Envy. > >> The differences is that with the former you have the notion of >> permissions etc. Since every user needs to have an account you will >> at least always know who published what unless of course one user >> figures out the password of the other user. > > Ok we decided not to have permissions but only have accounts. > >>> No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and >>> left with this wonderful error meassage. >>> >> >> BTW, just to check, are you using "switch databases"?, > No I will check that > >> if you are working with more than one StORE repository which I >> assume you are i.e. the one at the university and Cincom Public >> repository "switch databases" will maintain you reconciled with all >> the repositories that you use. You should do this after you connect. >> > >> -Charles >> >> >> >> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:06:33 +0200, stéphane ducasse >> <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: >> >>> sorry, is "boom" a good thing? i.e. I usually associate "boom" with >>> an explosion which is usually not a good thing :) >>>> >>>> I'll agree that StORE does not provide good messages but whenever >>>> you get a once of those not very informative dialogs simply break >>>> into the process i.e. do a "control Y" , then walk done the stack >>>> i.e. you should see where the dialog was actually asked to open, >>>> keep walking to where the code does most probably a "Dialog warn" >>>> or whatever construction of SimpleDialog and you will see the error >>>> and of course now you are in a wonderful Smalltalk debugger and >>>> therefore what is wrong should be quite a bit more apparent. Again, >>>> I do agree though that the messages that bubble up are not all that >>>> useful. >>> >>> Yes but normally to publish it this should have taken me 3 min and >>> now I will spent two hours at least. So I will give a try. >>> But I found that not really professional quality. >>> >>>> You are apparently also running the "user management" stuff in >>>> StORE. I have not yet had a reason to do so. >>> >>> I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get accounts? >>> Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who is >>> publishing what. >>> >>>> So my question is did Fredericks stuff actually make it into the >>>> public repository and again if it did does it work with SmallWiki 1 >>>> ? >>> >>> No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and >>> left with this wonderful error meassage. >>> >>> Stef >>> >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>>> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:40:30 +0200, stéphane ducasse >>>> <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Done >>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>>>> >>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied. >>>>> >>>>> Hi all this is the wonderful messages I get from store after been >>>>> disconnected. >>>>> really since of work. and yes and I also got a nice pop up saying >>>>> error: nil wonderful, quite user friendly and robust >>>>> with that. >>>>> >>>>> So here is what I did: I reconciled our internal one smallWiki >>>>> release with one in the cincom database. >>>>> Then I press release and boom. >>>>> >>>>> Stef >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: >>>> http://www.opera.com/m2/ >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/ >> > -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/