RE: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?

I was afraid you would say that. :( Is it limited to 4 with:'s like Squeak? In any case, VW does allow one to add behaviors to # easier last I heard. Maybe I can just make a #{} as part of my package. :)> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:16:32 +0200> From: philippe.marschall(a)gmail.com&gt; To: smallwiki(a)iam.unibe.ch&gt; Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?> > 2007/7/22, J J <azreal1977@hotmail.com>:> >> >> >> > ________________________________> > Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:42:34 -0400> > From: koschate(a)omasko.com&gt; > To: renggli(a)iam.unibe.ch&gt; > Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?> > CC: renggli(a)gmail.com; smallwiki(a)iam.unibe.ch&gt; >> >> > While I remember, a request to help with future ports: Please avoid the use> > of {} to define arrays, as VisualWorks doesn't know how to deal with this.> > --> > ============================================================> > Thomas Koschate> >> >> >> > Hrm, I use this a bit in my recurrence rules code. How do you get the same> > functionality in VW?> > Array with: with:...> > Philippe> > _______________________________________________> SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki _________________________________________________________________ See what you’re getting into…before you go there. http://newlivehotmail.com