I was afraid you would say that. :( Is it limited to 4 with:'s like Squeak? In any case, VW does allow one to add behaviors to # easier last I heard. Maybe I can just make a #{} as part of my package. :)

> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:16:32 +0200
> From: philippe.marschall@gmail.com
> To: smallwiki@iam.unibe.ch
> Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?
>
> 2007/7/22, J J <azreal1977@hotmail.com>:
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:42:34 -0400
> > From: koschate@omasko.com
> > To: renggli@iam.unibe.ch
> > Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?
> > CC: renggli@gmail.com; smallwiki@iam.unibe.ch
> >
> >
> > While I remember, a request to help with future ports: Please avoid the use
> > of {} to define arrays, as VisualWorks doesn't know how to deal with this.
> > --
> > ============================================================
> > Thomas Koschate
> >
> >
> >
> > Hrm, I use this a bit in my recurrence rules code. How do you get the same
> > functionality in VW?
>
> Array with: with:...
>
> Philippe
>
> _______________________________________________
> SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki

See what you’re getting into…before you go there. Check it out!