29 Sep
2004
29 Sep
'04
5:34 p.m.
On 29 sept. 04, at 17:08, Charles A. Monteiro wrote:
No I will check
that
stef said:
ok I was not aware of that. We installed it just when we migrated from
3.0 Envy.
I do not understand what you mean. That people
log and get accounts?
Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who is
publishing what.
You can install user/group management or not when you setup StORE,
this is different from people having user ids and logging in. The differences is that with the former you have the
notion of
permissions etc. Since every user needs to have an account you will at
least always know who published what unless of course one user figures
out the password of the other user.
Ok we decided not to have permissions but only have accounts.
No I could not
because I was deconnected from the repository and left
with this wonderful error meassage.
BTW, just to check, are you using "switch databases"?, if you are working with more than one StORE
repository which I assume
you are i.e. the one at the university and Cincom Public repository
"switch databases" will maintain you reconciled with all the
repositories that you use. You should do this after you connect.
I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could
publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could
see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird repository
locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run both.
I could create you an account in our store if you want.
-Charles
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:06:33 +0200, stéphane ducasse
<ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
sorry, is "boom" a good thing? i.e. I
usually associate "boom" with
an explosion which is usually not a good thing :)
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
I'll agree that StORE does not provide good messages but whenever
you get a once of those not very informative dialogs simply break
into the process i.e. do a "control Y" , then walk done the stack
i.e. you should see where the dialog was actually asked to open,
keep walking to where the code does most probably a "Dialog warn" or
whatever construction of SimpleDialog and you will see the error and
of course now you are in a wonderful Smalltalk debugger and
therefore what is wrong should be quite a bit more apparent. Again,
I do agree though that the messages that bubble up are not all that
useful.
Yes but normally to publish it this should have taken me 3 min and
now I will spent two hours at least. So I will give a try.
But I found that not really professional quality.
You are apparently also running the "user
management" stuff in
StORE. I have not yet had a reason to do so.
I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get accounts?
Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who is
publishing what.
So my question is did Fredericks stuff actually
make it into the
public repository and again if it did does it work with SmallWiki 1
?
No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and left
with this wonderful error meassage.
Stef
thanks
Charles
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:40:30 +0200, stéphane ducasse
<ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
Done
ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
Hi all this is the wonderful messages I get from store after been
disconnected.
really since of work. and yes and I also got a nice pop up saying
error: nil wonderful, quite user friendly and robust
with that.
So here is what I did: I reconciled our internal one smallWiki
release with one in the cincom database.
Then I press release and boom.
Stef
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/m2/