-Charles
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:34:20 +0200, stéphane ducasse
<ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
On 29 sept. 04, at 17:08, Charles A. Monteiro wrote:
> stef said:
>
>> I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get accounts?
>> Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who
>> is publishing what.
>
> You can install user/group management or not when you setup StORE,
> this is different from people having user ids and logging in.
ok I was not aware of that. We installed it just when we migrated
from 3.0 Envy.
> The differences is that with the former you have the notion of
> permissions etc. Since every user needs to have an account you will
> at least always know who published what unless of course one user
> figures out the password of the other user.
Ok we decided not to have permissions but only have accounts.
>> No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and
>> left with this wonderful error meassage.
>>
>
> BTW, just to check, are you using "switch databases"?,
No I will check that
> if you are working with more than one StORE repository which I
> assume you are i.e. the one at the university and Cincom Public
> repository "switch databases" will maintain you reconciled with all
> the repositories that you use. You should do this after you connect.
>
> I should setup my StORE on my Linux box at home , that way you could
> publish there i.e. it would be a virgin repository and then I could
> see what you are facing. Currently, I am running a Firebird
> repository locally on my XP notebook i.e. at home. At work I run
> both.
>
I could create you an account in our store if you want.
> -Charles
>
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:06:33 +0200, stéphane ducasse
> <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>
>> sorry, is "boom" a good thing? i.e. I usually associate
"boom" with
>> an explosion which is usually not a good thing :)
>>>
>>> I'll agree that StORE does not provide good messages but whenever
>>> you get a once of those not very informative dialogs simply break
>>> into the process i.e. do a "control Y" , then walk done the stack
>>> i.e. you should see where the dialog was actually asked to open,
>>> keep walking to where the code does most probably a "Dialog warn"
>>> or whatever construction of SimpleDialog and you will see the
>>> error and of course now you are in a wonderful Smalltalk debugger
>>> and therefore what is wrong should be quite a bit more apparent.
>>> Again, I do agree though that the messages that bubble up are not
>>> all that useful.
>>
>> Yes but normally to publish it this should have taken me 3 min and
>> now I will spent two hours at least. So I will give a try.
>> But I found that not really professional quality.
>>
>>> You are apparently also running the "user management" stuff in
>>> StORE. I have not yet had a reason to do so.
>>
>> I do not understand what you mean. That people log and get accounts?
>> Yes here we have a lot of user around and we prefered to know who
>> is publishing what.
>>
>>> So my question is did Fredericks stuff actually make it into the
>>> public repository and again if it did does it work with SmallWiki
>>> 1 ?
>>
>> No I could not because I was deconnected from the repository and
>> left with this wonderful error meassage.
>>
>> Stef
>>
>>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>> Charles
>>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:40:30 +0200, stéphane ducasse
>>> <ducasse(a)iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Done
>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
>>>>
>>>> ERROR: tw_package: Permission denied.
>>>>
>>>> Hi all this is the wonderful messages I get from store after been
>>>> disconnected.
>>>> really since of work. and yes and I also got a nice pop up saying
>>>> error: nil wonderful, quite user friendly and robust
>>>> with that.
>>>>
>>>> So here is what I did: I reconciled our internal one smallWiki
>>>> release with one in the cincom database.
>>>> Then I press release and boom.
>>>>
>>>> Stef
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
>>>
http://www.opera.com/m2/
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
>
http://www.opera.com/m2/
>