6 Nov
2003
6 Nov
'03
6:51 p.m.
I would guess it just needs a bit more testing on
squeak.
Yes
I hope others can do it because I just don't have
the bandwidth now
and VW
is not an option. Maybe there are not serious problems past this first
one
I encountered.
I hope :)
As I said, I think SmallWiki would fit perfectly into
my current
project,
as a help system. It even looks very similar in some ways to my
application web pages.
Excellent then.
I also like that I'd probably be able to integrate
it closely within my
app because I can tap into smalltalk more easily in the pages.
let us know
Stef
6 Nov
6 Nov
7:02 p.m.
New subject: swiki, commanche , 3.6, network rewrite, oh my
ducasse wrote:
That is encouraging (more than the comments in the package header on
Squeakmap!)
chris could you be explicit about the difference between
SmallWiki/Squeak and SmallWiki/VW in the package on Squeak Map because
it would be bad that people think that SmallWiki in general is bad.
Stef,
I had a quick look at it and in general it is not stable yet...it looks
to me like they are just VW vs Squeak differences that need to be ironed
out. For example, I don't think any of the persistence backends are
working (just in memory storage).
But, the package clearly states that the port is full of bugs right
now...so I don't think anyone will think SmallWiki is bad...just that
the port is not yet finished.
- Stephen
7481
days inactive
7481
days old
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
ducasse -
Stephen Pair