> Thanks. In the latest version of all Grease packages and the print: method is not around in the Stream hierarchy. Ok, then it should be added. > So, for is it Ok to have the fix in BOLatexWriter>>visitInternalLink: by replacing stream with latex to work with print: or do you see problems there? No, the two strams don't have te same semantics. stream print: '\' should print '\'; latex print: '\' should print '\\'.

Lukas > > Cheers, > Doru > > > On 24 Sep 2011, at 23:11, Lukas Renggli wrote: > >> Yes, this is intentional: 'stream' is the raw low-level stream, 'latex' is the high-level encoded stream. The choice to which you send the output is important. Changing it likely breaks the generation of valid LaTeX. >> >> GRPharoUtf8CodecStream or better its abstract superclass should implement #print:. I think this was discussed in the Seaside list recently and fixed, but I might be wrong. >> >> Lukas >> >> On Saturday, 24 September 2011, Tudor Girba <tudor(a)tudorgirba.com> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am testing Pier 2 some more, and now I got a problem in the Latex writer. Specifically, I do not quite understand the difference between the latex instance variable and the inherited stream one. >>> >>> Take a look at the snippet below: >>> >>> BOLatexWriter>>visitInternalLink: anInternalLink >>>                ... >>>                latex tab ... square: [ stream nextPutAll: 'width='; print: ((anInternalLink parameterAt: 'width' ifAbsent: [ 100 ]) asNumber / 100.0); ... ] >>> >>> When executed on a book we have two instance variables: >>> - stream: instance of GRPharoUtf8CodecStream (inherited) >>> - latex: instance of BOLatexStream which wraps stream >>> >>> Now, it so happens that GRPharoUtf8CodecStream does not understand print:, but this method exists in BOLatexStream. I fixed the code by replacing stream with latex in the above method, and it works. >>> >>> But, there are still other places that use stream, and I think they should all use the BOLatexStream instance instead. So, my question is: Is this intentional? Or maybe should we actually simply override the setting of stream and use that one for everything? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Doru >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> www.tudorgirba.com >>> >>> "Yesterday is a fact. >>>  Tomorrow is a possibility. >>>  Today is a challenge." >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... >>> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki >>> >> >> -- >> Lukas Renggli >> www.lukas-renggli.ch >> _______________________________________________ >> Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ... >> https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki > > -- > www.tudorgirba.com > > "From an abstract enough point of view, any two things are similar." > > > > _______________________________________________ > seaside mailing list > seaside(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org > http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside > -- Lukas Renggli www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ seaside mailing list seaside(a)lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/seaside