-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I'm just curious that how much faster the seaside
2.8 is (than
2.7/2.6).
Yes, I know that this is wrong question because it will be different
from case by case, but for example,
It is a bit early to talk about exact figures.
1. page generation(?) speed
Generating a Pier page is at least twice as fast with Seaside 2.8.
Other applications also show major page rendering improvement, but it
heavily depends on the kind of application.
2. simple request processing speed - maybe counter
example?
None as of now.
Major memory improvements (and managing less memory is presumably
also much faster) are possible by using partial continuations. There
are currently some experiments driven, however it is not that easy to
do and it requires major rewrites of the whole query processing.
3. I/O (network or file) speed
None as of now.
For now Seaside development focuses on 1 and 2. 3 is equally
important, but it is a bit out of the scope of most peoples interests.
Cheers,
Lukas
- - --
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGH0wlqY3r31skrBwRAoulAKCiTfOjs21902R/WbGy/zEk6vTTnwCeIr8/
RksXABxPa5JR7PcIVkozL6k=
=X85/
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP
SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFGH0xkqY3r31skrBwRAqEvAJ9qjbYAdx9MnZGnGRM/XnzSW6YYBACgldqz
Kkjy4VdZKTwd09Z3z5GP7go=
=2uSf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----