28 Sep
2010
28 Sep
'10
9:50 a.m.
Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described
objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it.
Thank you
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry
28 Sep
28 Sep
9:02 p.m.
2010/9/28 Damien Cassou <damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described
objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it.
There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP.
Cheers
Philippe
29 Sep
29 Sep
11:12 a.m.
On 28.09.2010, at 21:02, Philippe Marschall wrote:
2010/9/28 Damien Cassou
<damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>om>:
Where is it? I'm interested because I created a Magritte-XML package that tries to
deal with this.
Norbert
Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described
objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it.
There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP.
8:53 p.m.
2010/9/29 Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>me>:
On 28.09.2010, at 21:02, Philippe Marschall wrote:
Wherever you put it ;-)
Cheers
Philippe
2010/9/28 Damien Cassou
<damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>om>:
Where is it? Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described
objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it.
There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP.
10:42 p.m.
On 29.09.2010, at 20:53, Philippe Marschall wrote:
2010/9/29 Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name>me>:
Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It can
be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And right, it knows nothing
about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite easy. Some can map the objects including
relationships in a SOAP way (it's only plain nested objects). Then there is only the
SOAP envelope missing. Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just
don't like SOAP :)
Norbert
On 28.09.2010, at 21:02, Philippe Marschall wrote:
Wherever you put it ;-)
2010/9/28 Damien Cassou
<damien.cassou(a)gmail.com>om>:
Where is it? Hi,
does any of you know about Philippe's work to map SOAP to described
objects and vice versa? I would like to have a look at it.
There's an XML binding library but that knows nothing about SOAP.
30 Sep
30 Sep
3:10 p.m.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Hartl <norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote:
Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about
Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It
can be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And
right, it knows nothing about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite
easy. Some can map the objects including relationships in a SOAP way (it's
only plain nested objects). Then there is only the SOAP envelope missing.
Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just don't like SOAP
:)
Thank you very much. In fact, I didn't want to do SOAP at all. It's
just that Lukas told me about such a library that I could have a look
at to help me create a Pier<->XML serializer. Looks like this library
does not exist after all :-).
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry
4 p.m.
On 30.09.2010, at 15:10, Damien Cassou wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Norbert Hartl
<norbert(a)hartl.name> wrote:
What do you want to do? Just serialize pier? That you can do with Sixx. It will
serialize the object graph with type dependent xml elements.
Norbert
Ah, now I see :) If we are talking about
Magritte-XMLBinding that I know. It
can be found here (http://source.lukas-renggli.ch/magritteaddons). And
right, it knows nothing about SOAP. But this should be achievable quite
easy. Some can map the objects including relationships in a SOAP way (it's
only plain nested objects). Then there is only the SOAP envelope missing.
Would be a good use case to improve the xml binding. I just don't like SOAP
:)
Thank you very much. In fact, I didn't want to do SOAP at all. It's
just that Lukas told me about such a library that I could have a look
at to help me create a Pier<->XML serializer. Looks like this library
does not exist after all :-).
5196
days inactive
5198
days old
6 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Damien Cassou -
Norbert Hartl -
Philippe Marschall