11 Jul
2010
11 Jul
'10
4:28 p.m.
http://validator.w3.org/
many seaside.st pages found to have lots of errors according to the
automatic validator.
e.g. http://www.seaside.st/community/weblogs
Likewise with forcing it to use another validator than the one specified
in the webpage.
http://www.piercms.com/ homepage shows errors also
Lawson
11 Jul
11 Jul
4:49 p.m.
New subject: [Seaside] w3 validator doesn't pass many seaside/pier pages
On 7/11/10 7:28 AM, Lawson English wrote:
http://validator.w3.org/
many seaside.st pages found to have lots of errors according to the
automatic validator.
e.g. http://www.seaside.st/community/weblogs
OTOH, the google home page doesn't pass either: http://www.google.com
so why should anything else?
Lawson
4:56 p.m.
New subject: [Seaside] w3 validator doesn't pass many seaside/pier pages
On 7/11/10 7:49 AM, Lawson English wrote:
On 7/11/10 7:28 AM, Lawson English wrote:
http://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-importance-of-valid-source-code-w3c-…
points out that search engines and other web bot tools may not be as
forgiving as the main browsers, so content from non-standard pages may
not show up on google and other sites.
Food for thought.
Lawson
http://validator.w3.org/
many seaside.st pages found to have lots of errors according to the
automatic validator.
e.g. http://www.seaside.st/community/weblogs
OTOH, the google home page doesn't pass either: http://www.google.com
so why should anything else?
5278
days inactive
5278
days old
2 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Lawson English