My other Morphic changes have not caused any obvious push back, so I'd like to go ahead with my suggestion from a while back... Motivation: When I first used Magritte, I was terribly confused that #asMorph does not actually return a morph, and requires "object asMorph morph" to get the actual morph (http://forum.world.st/Customizing-Magritte-Morphic-Forms-tt4251518.html#a42…) Solution: Rename classes messages to reveal intention 1) #asMagritteMorph a. change #asMagritteMorph to something like maMorphicContainer (returns a presenter/builder, not a Morph) b. if we want #asMagritteMorph, have it return the actual morph (i.e. "self maMorphicContainer morph") 2) MAContainerMorph and friends -> MAMorphicContainer - these are not Morphs. I was actually astonished when I saw they did not inherit from Morph. If there is no opposition, I'll make these changes shortly. BTW: what is the policy re non-backward compatible changes? How should they be documented? In Pharo, methods are deprecated for a version, but I didn't want to do that because I assumed Magritte should run on other Smalltalks. Although I see Squeak has #deprecated:, so maybe that would be safe... ----- Cheers, Sean -- View this message in context: http://forum.world.st/Proposal-to-rename-some-Morphic-classes-tp4815311.html Sent from the Magritte, Pier and Related Tools mailing list archive at Nabble.com.