8 Apr
2010
8 Apr
'10
11:35 a.m.
On 08.04.2010, at 11:17, Reza RAZAVI wrote:
It is not lost, it is the active one.
It is the old one. Well, I get the text from the property "set on old
context" which I applied on the old one. Even if I do PRCurrentContext value. The
only reason I can imagine is that the context has not been exchanged and the old is still
active. But then pressing the anchor brings me to the new page which was defined by
creating the new context. Those two facts together make me wonder. I can't change the
page without having a new context but on the new page the old context seems to be active.
Norbert
At 10:16 08/04/2010, you wrote:
It doesn't make any difference. I already exchanged the usage of "self
context" with "PRCurrentContext value" but without effect.
In PRWidget the #context is cached.
Yes, but the cache is updated upon a context change by:
PRWidget >> onChangeContext:
But I would
have expected that the old context message is set on the old context, the old context is
copied to a new one and the setting of the property with the new context text should have
overriden the old one.
I unfortunately don't have time to double check this right now, but am pretty sure
that this is how Pier works.
I don't need the old context it is just a
test measure to see that setting a property has an effect.
I'm not sure about your test setup, since your 'old' context is cached by
PRWidget, and 'lost' upon the context change (that replaces the 'old'
context, with the 'new' one).
This new
context is attached to an html anchor. When this anchor is pressed I would expect that the
context provided via goto: is active. Exactly this does not happen
In your first post on this thread, you also said "What makes me wonder is that under
any circumstances the text being display is "set on old context". Even if I
press the link "go". Why is that so?"
These two observations put together, would they mean that when the anchor is pressed, the
current context is neither the 'old' one, nor the 'new' one? What do you
get exactly as context then? (My understanding is that in any case it can't be the old
one, since it is 'lost', as explained above.)