16 Jun
2010
16 Jun
'10
11:17 p.m.
Lukas,
The senders (using the non-portable variant with unary block arg) are
all in Pier-Security-lr.165.
Dale
Lukas Renggli wrote:
I don't see any senders in my image.
Actually #ifNotNil: is accepted by Slime, the rewrite rules we follow are these:
self rewriteRule
replace: '``@boolean ifNotNilDo: ``@block'
with: '``@boolean ifNotNil: ``@block';
replace: '``@boolean ifNotNilDo: ``@block1 ifNil: ``@block2'
with: '``@boolean ifNotNil: ``@block1 ifNil: ``@block2';
replace: '``@boolean ifNil: ``@block1 ifNotNilDo: ``@block2'
with: '``@boolean ifNil: ``@block1 ifNotNil: ``@block2';
replace: '``@boolean ifNotNil: [ | `@temps | ``@.body ]'
with: '``@boolean ifNotNil: [ :arg | | `@temps | ``@.body ]';
replace: '``@boolean ifNotNil: [ | `@temps | ``@.body ] ifNil: ``@block '
with: '``@boolean ifNotNil: [ :arg | | `@temps | ``@.body ] ifNil: ``@block';
replace: '``@boolean ifNil: ``@block ifNotNil: [ | `@temps | ``@.body ]'
with: '``@boolean ifNil: ``@block ifNotNil: [ :arg | | `@temps | ``@.body ]'
Personally I only use #ifNil: for lazy accessors, otherwise I don't
like these constructs.
Lukas
On 16 June 2010 21:37, Dale Henrichs <dhenrich(a)vmware.com> wrote:
I'm porting to Pier2 to GemStone and ran
into several places where
#ifNotNil: is being used ... what is the accepted replacement for #ifNotNil:
... I can clean these up as part of my port.
Dale
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki