22 Jul
2007
22 Jul
'07
10:42 p.m.
2007/7/22, J J <azreal1977(a)hotmail.com>om>:
I was afraid you would say that. :( Is it limited to 4 with:'s like Squeak?
Then use streams. See senders of #braceStream:
In any case, VW does allow one to add behaviors to #
easier last I heard.
Maybe I can just make a #{} as part of my package. :)
No. Just don't use curly brace arrays.
Philippe
________________________________
________________________________
See what you're getting into…before you go there. Check it out!
_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 13:16:32 +0200
From: philippe.marschall(a)gmail.com
To: smallwiki(a)iam.unibe.ch
Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?
2007/7/22, J J <azreal1977(a)hotmail.com>om>:
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:42:34 -0400
> From: koschate(a)omasko.com
> To: renggli(a)iam.unibe.ch
> Subject: Re: Differences w/ exception handling in Magritte..?
> CC: renggli(a)gmail.com; smallwiki(a)iam.unibe.ch
>
>
> While I remember, a request to help with future ports: Please avoid the
use
> of {} to define arrays, as VisualWorks
doesn't know how to deal with
this.
> --
>
============================================================
> Thomas Koschate
>
>
>
> Hrm, I use this a bit in my recurrence rules code. How do you get the
same
functionality in VW?
Array with: with:...
Philippe
_______________________________________________
SmallWiki, Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki