20 Dec
2003
20 Dec
'03
9:47 a.m.
On 19 déc. 03, at 21:25, Lukas Renggli wrote:
I think that for admin this makes sense.
For standard user requiring that is the smell that there is two much
may be in such a case we should have a more... button that show the
optional one.
stef
- there might
be a problem with the versioning: the version of a
structure is not the same as the version of the structures children
parent.
(structure version != structure children first parent version)
...I'm not sure if the version should always be the same.
No, all structures are versioned independently. There is no need to
create new version for the parent, if a child changes.
- another question:
I want the admin link to be visible just like the other ones: view,
edit, contents etc., what is the best way to do this? do I have to
modify each structure's template?
There are only about 3 templates defined on this wiki: the root, the
SmallWiki folder and the CaroAndBot folder. As you know, these
instances are shared among all their corresponding child structures,
so you have to change only those 3 places.
Weak as I am, I would use the powerful reflection mechanism of
Smalltalk and do something like:
SmallWiki.TemplateBodyActions allInstances do: [ :each |
each actions add: SmallWiki.AdminAction ]
Actually I would like to integrate some other actions into the central
admin menu-item, like the history, the template and the property
editor (something new I wrote yesterday night). We should also think
about a way to show the actions of a page in a tree-like structure, as
there are too many items to show in one line
Admin
History
Properties
Template
Components
Configuration
Stylesheet
Security
User
Roles
Permissions
...
Cheers,
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://renggli.freezope.org