Re: [ANN] SmallWiki 2 and Squeak

I am running a SmallWiki for the NYC Smalltalk user's group. I can run it because I am not engaging in commerce i.e. it runs on a non-commercial license, to that extent it is very clear what one can and can not do. Not sure why you all are having such a difficulty in understanding this. If somebody wants to make money with SmallWiki and finds it offensive to share with the technology partner that creates the tools which allow one to run and enhance SmallWiki then said individual would have to use Squeak. BTW, BottomFeeder does not have "this issue" as you put it because it is a non-commercial product therefore it can use the "non-commercial" license. VW can run headless. VisualWave servers are deployed headlessly. I keep hearing about Monticello it would be nice to see a comparison in order to understand why it is more advanced than StORE. A full copy of the email apparently does did not get sent. Is there now a "traits" implementation in Squeak? Oh yes, why would one want to run a VNC server from within the Squeak image?