Damir,
I would help if I could, but I don't know enough to answer your question.
Hence the private answer.
What I know is this: early in the summer, when I was trying to upgrade
from Pharo 1.2 to a modern version of Pharo, and gain simple DB
connectivity (via glorp), I had a difficult time getting the few packages I
needed to all play well together. My needs were simple: Pier for the
seaside and magritte, and glorp, and Fuel. I found that I could only work
with a very lean image to avoid conflicts: raw-release + pier3 + glorp +
opendbx + fuel. Now I have a stable image, and I won't change a thing for a
year... or until I hear that 2.0 is stable.
Pharo 2.0 looks like it has a nice set of tools!
Magritte3 moved the xxxDescription methods to the instance side, and it
uses pragmas, so the name matters less. (Not at all? i don't recall.)
Overall, it was an improvement in the name space and so I am glad I spent
the couple of days learning the new tools and converting/upgrading.
You might be hitting the same namespace problems that I hit related to
Magritte3. The problem is #description ... -- i forget the details.
Nick Ager was quite helpful pointing to a video showing how to upgrade from
Magritte2 to 3.
Good Luck!
-Cam
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Damir Majer <damir(a)majcon.de> wrote:
Hi Cam, hi Mariano,
thanks for your replies.
As I understand, it seem´s that Pier2 is not stable (ready?) for the new
Pharo1.4 because of the OmniBrowser Dependencies.
So I guess, that I have to use Pier3 with the latest Pharo1.4/2.0 to get an
stable version of Pier?
Cheers,
Damir