19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
9:36 a.m.
Thank, I will look at it when I am back home. My only worry was that
if you had a single = or @ in the text, it would be escaped.
Lukas
On Tuesday, 19 July 2011, Nick Ager <nick.ager(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've checked in the changes. There were only a
couple of tests that needed modifying, they acted as base tests for derived classes and
made the number of test failures seem large. If I've missed something I'm happy to
roll-back:
Name: Pier-Model-NickAger.411Author: NickAgerTime: 18 July 2011, 10:47:33 pmUUID:
d23e8ad0-6e18-4f69-a7fc-7399a8493379Ancestors: Pier-Model-NickAger.410
modified the way markup is escaped, so that:
'@@' is now escaped as: '\@\@' rather than as previously: '\@@'
Name: Pier-Tests-Model-NickAger.23
Author: NickAgerTime: 18 July 2011, 10:44:42 pmUUID:
d6cb4015-84c6-45c1-8daa-6f3357f63d92Ancestors: Pier-Tests-Model-NickAger.22,
Pier-Tests-Model-lr.21
modified tests to reflect changes in escaped markup:
'@@' => '\@\@'
--
Lukas Renggli
www.lukas-renggli.ch