20 Apr
2010
20 Apr
'10
2:31 a.m.
Yes of cours if it is done correctly many things can be extended. But in
that case it might be Margritte that will suffer from an important API
change.
Maybe they won' agree on that. Is it not to difficult to keep everybody
happy ?
@+Maarten,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Юрий Мироненко" <tallman(a)inbox.ru>
To: "ESUG Mailing list" <esug-list(a)lists.esug.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 12:26 AM
Subject: Re[2]: [Esug-list] GLORP & Magritte integration/refactoring
I would however prefer that you don't change
Glorp's API as might be your
intention.
As Niall told some day before, nothing prevent from supporting current API
via new methods, it's even some kind of additional test.
_______________________________________________
Esug-list mailing list
Esug-list(a)lists.esug.org
http://lists.esug.org/listinfo/esug-list