31 Aug
2010
31 Aug
'10
6:57 p.m.
At 18:13 31/08/2010, Lukas Renggli wrote:
Keeping the relationship is intentional to be able to
remove and
reinstall the tree somewhere else. I think the parent link is also
required to be able to restore a deleted page.
Well noted; thanks for the precisions!
So why do you think the parent should be nilled?
It seems that the memory space is never released, because even when
later the *max history* is reached in PRHistoryPersistency, #do: just
removes from its history collection the context that points to the
"removed" (hidden?) structure. So, if I understand well, the
structure will not be garbage collected due to the circular
relationship between the parent and its children?
Regards,
Reza