About running Wiki on VWNC

Hi michael This is mainly me that prefers SmallWiki in VW because we are also using it for other experiences and teaching. Roel also has lectures using VW. And I'm not teaching using Squeak for multiple reasons but one is that the UI framework is really bad and second I do not want the impression that Smalltalk is childish. We have enough problems not to look strange and ridiculous to use smalltalk not to add more. We also use VW because also Squeak VM are NOT stable on Unix (we had to write a script to check if they are working, imagine). Then we are not making money with SmallWiki so we can use the non-commercial version of VW. I guess that this is the same for you. James will let us know. When we started SW, MC was really in its enfancy. If Squeak would have a better package mechanism and people would be willing to help and they would be in Squeak then why not. Now the point is if people are really willing to help lukas and they prefer Squeak for me I do not care. But right now SmallWiki is a good wiki and we should pay attention to it. Stef I think that lot of the problems will be resolved with SmallWiki 2. But it is also important to provide feedback to lukas and others. So can you be more precise on the problems and how you would solve them? I will ask james about that. James what is the status of cincom on that? Should a company running a wiki pay for VW? I think that this would be a mistake because this could show how stable is the VM. But just let us know. Stef