12 Jan
2006
12 Jan
'06
9:27 a.m.
Lukas
may be it would be good to republish your latest Smallwiki 1 (0.9.51)
version as SmallWiki 1.0 with a comment on store.
Stef
Hi Samir,
thanks for your efforts merging the versions. I know about all the
pain of having different versions from SqueakSource :-/
- the visual works one.
I stopped working on SmallWiki 1 in Summer 2004, so the most recent
code from myself is version 0.9.51 on Cincom Public Store.
Afterwards I didn't touch that code anymore because I started with
SmallWiki 2 (now called Pier).
- the squeak port done by Chris Bukert
- the seaside stable image used for squeak.org
The seaside image is basically the port of Chris Bukert, but we
fixed a few things directly in there. I don't remember exactly, but
I think the changes we made are now in the current Squeak port.
1.9.51.20.2 by greevy (23 November 2004), but
don't know if it
includes the changes from camp smalltalk. I tried the greevy version,
but found a lot of missing methods (prepareCookies for instance)
whereas the bulckaen version seems to be ok (17 September 2004). Is
the bulckaen version related to the latest public store release (29
September 2004) ? or the greevy version ? Someone knows ? This
archeological work will be valuable if people who participated could
give some information !
Sorry, I have no idea about this. Orla? Stef?
And is the seaside version based on the Chris
port ? I guess so, but
it seems that there is a lot of changes, no ?
What Seaside versions are you talking about?
* If you are talking about TinyWiki or PicoWiki, these are
basically rip-offs taking the parser and the document
representation of SmallWiki 1 and plugging that into a Seaside
component. These are just small sub-sets of SmallWiki 1, as their
name says.
* SmallWiki 2 / Pier is a complete rewrite from scratch. Most (if
not all) parts are very different. From design point of view
probably only the document representation didn't change much. It
should be quite easy to port back, but I guess there are not that
many new features that it is worth the hassle.
Cheers,
Lukas
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch