23 Jan
2010
23 Jan
'10
2:09 a.m.
And I didn't do anything other than the bare minimum with that package
because I was being paid to make the port work for VA, not Pharo. :)
The tests should definitely be split out.
Julian
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Lukas Renggli <renggli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
No, that's not intentional and should be split. In
Pier 1 I was too
lazy to have the tests of the extra packages separate and that has not
been fixed jet in Pier 2.
Lukas
On Saturday, January 23, 2010, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs(a)gemstone.com> wrote:
I'm building Metacello configurations for
Pier2 (and Magritte2) and I've run into the fact that the tests for
Pier-Pharo-Persistency are included in the package and that those tests depend upon
Pier-Model-Tests.
Since things have been repackaged for Pier2, it might make sense to split out the
Pharo-persistency tests so that things can be loaded without tests.
Of course, if this is intentional..."Never mind":)
Dale
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki