Am 09.12.2004 um 15:09 schrieb Charles A. Monteiro:
I am running a SmallWiki for the NYC Smalltalk
user's group. I can run
it because I am not engaging in commerce i.e. it runs on a
non-commercial license, to that extent it is very clear what one can
and can not do. Not sure why you all are having such a difficulty in
understanding this. If somebody wants to make money with SmallWiki and
finds it offensive to share with the technology partner that creates
the tools which allow one to run and enhance SmallWiki then said
individual would have to use Squeak. BTW, BottomFeeder does not have
"this issue" as you put it because it is a non-commercial product
therefore it can use the "non-commercial" license.
SmallWiki is a non-commercial product, too. Yet everybody *using* it in
a commercial setting has to have a *developers* license.
We asked. This is official Cincom policy. The same is true for other
projects, e.g. Moose and CodeCrawler.
Marcus