23 Jan
2010
23 Jan
'10
1:58 a.m.
No, that's not intentional and should be split. In Pier 1 I was too
lazy to have the tests of the extra packages separate and that has not
been fixed jet in Pier 2.
Lukas
On Saturday, January 23, 2010, Dale Henrichs <dale.henrichs(a)gemstone.com> wrote:
I'm building Metacello configurations for Pier2
(and Magritte2) and I've run into the fact that the tests for Pier-Pharo-Persistency
are included in the package and that those tests depend upon Pier-Model-Tests.
Since things have been repackaged for Pier2, it might make sense to split out the
Pharo-persistency tests so that things can be loaded without tests.
Of course, if this is intentional..."Never mind":)
Dale
_______________________________________________
Magritte, Pier and Related Tools ...
https://www.iam.unibe.ch/mailman/listinfo/smallwiki
--
Lukas Renggli
http://www.lukas-renggli.ch