4 Oct
2006
4 Oct
'06
2:31 p.m.
2006/10/4, Ian Prince <ian(a)inextenso.com>om>:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 13:07, Philippe Marschall wrote:
macam is a Dual G5 and is indeed *really* noisy. But it's in a server
room so this is not really a problem for us.
Philippe
2006/10/4, Michael Haupt
<mhaupt(a)gmail.com>om>:
> Dear list,
>
> does anybody have experience with running Squeak services, especially
> Seaside/Pier and Monticello, on Apple Xserve hardware?
I run a Seaside image and a Swiki image on a single Mac Mini running
10.3.9 - uptimes in hundreds of days. Only downside is that Squeak
does take between 2-6% of the CPU, even when idle:
From top:
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD
RSIZE VSIZE
13099 Squeak VM 2.2% 104 hrs 3 76 91 24.3M 3.27M
23.4M 631M
FWIW, I prefer Netopia's Timbuktu for remote management.
I've read that Xserves are *really* noisy, so you might want to get a
cabinet if you are running them in your office.